Models of mediation and mechanism of its implementation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2020.03.012Keywords:
mediation, mediator, mediation model, mediation procedure, dispute, negotiationsAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of the institute of mediation, which has become quite widely used in world and European practice. In resolving conflicts (disputes), mediation provides greater opportunities for the conflicting parties to choose pre-trial and extrajudicial methods to resolve the conflict situation. According to the content of mediation, the role of the mediator, ie an impartial and neutral third party, is primarily to assist the parties in: communicating, identifying their interests and assisting in achieving a mutually acceptable solution. In addition, the tools and techniques are crucial, as well as the style preferred by the mediator. Taking all these factors into account, the doctrine distinguishes many types of mediation, but leaves this catalog open.
The article analyzes the main scientific approaches to the classification of mediation models. After many years of using mediation in the common law system, as well as increasing use in the continental law system, there has been a debate about whether mediation is a procedure with clear principles or, as an informal procedure, can take different forms, verified according to a number of elements, for example, cultural, which arise from the specifics of dispute resolution in a particular area, or from kind of the dispute itself. Although the idea of the existence of types of mediation (so-called models or types) was accepted by the world community, it should be noted that the main models of mediation, which are often described in the literature, were formed in North America, Australia and the European Union.
It is shown that within one procedure it is possible to distinguish different models, the application of which depends on such elements as: the nature of the dispute, the expectations of the parties, the style of the procedure chosen by the mediator. A professional mediator must have the ability and practical skills to adapt the mediation model to the needs and expectations of the parties. It is emphasized that the existing models of mediation should be considered as a basis for identifying and applying in practice various mediation technologies, which will allow the parties to the conflict to reach an understanding, to find the optimal solution.
References
Dyrektyva 2008/52/ES Yevropeiskoho parlamentu i Rady pro deiaki aspekty mediatsii u tsyvilnykh ta komertsiinykh spravakh [Directive 2008/52 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters] (2008, May 21). Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_a95 [in Ukrainian].
Hmuzhynska, Ye. (2007). Mediatsiia u tsyvilnykh spravakh v amerykanskii pravovii systemi. Zastosuvannia v Yevropi ta Polshchi [Mediation in civil matters in the American legal system. Application in Europe and Poland]. Varshava [in Poland].
Mazaraki, N. (2019). Teoretyko-pravovi zasady zaprovadzhennia mediatsii v Ukraini [Theoretical and legal bases of introduction of mediation in Ukraine]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Karmaza O. (2017). Instytu mediatsii: osnovni kontseptsii rozvytku [Institute of mediation: basic concepts of development]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Hmuzhynska, E, Morek, R. (2014). Mediatsiia. Teoriia i praktyka [Mediation. Theory and practice]. Varshava [in Poland].
Bitsai, A. V. (2013). Modeli mediatsii u sviti ta perspektyvy dlia Ukrainy [Models of mediation in the world and prospects for Ukraine]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Kalashnykova, S.Y. (2011). Medyatsyia v sfere hrazhdanskoi yurysdyktsyy. [Mediation in the field of civil jurisdiction]. Moskva [in Russian].
Rystyn, H. (2010). Shche ne vse vtracheno ... Alternatyvne vyrishennia sporiv na rivni apeliatsii [All is not lost yet… Alternative dispute resolution at the level of appeals]. Moskva [in Russian].
Zhmud, V. (2008). Zaprovadzhennia protsedury mediatsii (prymyrennia) u zakonodavstvi Ukrainy [Introduction of mediation procedure in Ukrainian legislation]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Denysenko, S. V. (2012). Strukturnyi analiz Mediatsiinykh protsedur [Structural analysis of mediation procedures]. Moskva [in Russian].
Labutina, M. V. (2012). Modeli mediatsii [Models of mediation]. Samara [in Russian].
Shamir, Y. Alternative dispute resolution approaches and their application. [in English].
Kyselova, T. (2011). Pravove rehuliuvannia vidnosyn iz nadannia posluh mediatsii u zarubizhnykh krainakh [Legal regulation of relations on the provision of mediation services in foreign countries]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Iasynovskyi, I.H. (2014). Kharakterystyka modelei mediatsii v rozvynutykh krainakh [Characteristics of mediation models in developed countries]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Hren, N. (2016). Perevahy prysudovoi mediatsii dlia realizatsii prava na spravedlyvyi sud [Advantages of adjudicative mediation for exercising the right to a fair trial]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Labutyna, M. V. (2012). Modeli mediatsii [Models of mediation]. Samara [in Russian].
Shynkar, T.I. (2017). Zastosuvannia mediatsii v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi: vitchyznianyi ta zarubizhnyi dosvid [Application of mediation in administrative proceedings: domestic and foreign experience]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Davydenko, N. (2017). Mediatsiia yak alternatyvnyi sposib vyrishennia sporiv v Ukraini. [Mediation as an alternative way of resolving disputes in Ukraine]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Hmuzhynska, Ye. & Morek, R. (2018). Mediatsiia: teoriia i praktyka [Mediation: theory and practice]. Varshava [in Poland].
Riskin, L. (1996). Understanding Mediators` Orientations, Strategies and Techniques: A Grid For the Perplexed. [in English].
Fisher, R., Ury, W. (1983). Getting to Yes. Negotiating Agreement without Giving in. Niu-York [in English].
Baruch Bush, R.A. & Fogler, J.P. (1994). Promise of Mediation. Responding to Conflict through Empowerment and Recognition. San Francisco [in English].
Winslade, J. & Monk, G. A (2017). Narrative Approach to Mediation. [in English].
Umbreit, M.S. (1997). Humanistic Mediation. A Transformative Journey of Peacemaking. Mediation Quaterly, 14, 201-213. [in English].https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.3900140305