Historical aspects of the emergence and development of extrajudicial settlement of disputes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2021.01.027Keywords:
historical aspects of extrajudicial settlement of disputes, ways of non-state resolution of disputes, reconciliation of parties, mediation in resolving disputes.Abstract
Transition of Ukraine to market economic relations, changing their legal regulation, opens opportunities for the use of non-state forms of conflict settlement, which will allow you to unload the existing state judicial system. These forms of dispute resolution are called alternatives, because they are used as an alternative to the state settlement of disputes.
As European experience shows, in terms of economic freedom and business cooperation, business legal relations are increasingly interested in operational methods of dispute settlement. That is why the Institute for extrajudicial settlement of disputes is capable of becoming an effective means in their solution and a full mechanism in the system of alternative ways to solve them.
Therefore, the allocation of historical stages of the formation of the procedures for extrajudicial settlement of disputes contributes to the knowledge of their legal nature as autonomous ways of solving conflicts and methods that increase the efficiency of administrative-procedural activities in general.
Characteristic features of the phenomenon of extrajudicial dispute settlement began to be formed at the stages of the birth of human civilization. History of extrajudicial settlement of disputes by scientists to consider as a history of changes in its three forms: antipard or violent, judicial (restoration of violated rights in court) and reconient.
Extraordinary methods for resolving disputes at various historical stages were and remain a set of various conciliation procedures, aimed at impartial conflict resolution with the help of certain mechanisms and methods that provide a rapid and effective dispute resolution in order to reconcile the interests of the parties. It is the search for a compromise in the legal dispute and the readiness of the parties to understanding and certain concessions are the fundamental principles of extrajudicial dispute resolution, which creates wide opportunities for reconciliation and further cooperation between the parties.
Therefore, there is a need to develop and function in Ukraine by institutes of extrajudicial dispute, which has long effectively operating in many countries of the world.
References
Davyidenko, D.L. (2004). Iz istorii primiritelnyih protsedur v Zapadnoy Evropei SShA [From the history of conciliation procedures in Western Europe and the United States]. Vestnik Vyisshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii: ofitsialnoe ezhemesyachnoe pechatnoe izdanie Vyisshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF – Vestnyk Vыssheho Arbytrazhnoho Suda Rossyiskoi Federatsyy: ofytsyalnoe ezhemesiachnoe pechatnoe yzdanye Vyssheho Arbytrazhnoho Suda, 1, 163-176 [in Russian].
Karpenko, R. (2020). Istorychni peredumovy vprovadzhennia mediatsii v Ukraini ta inshykh derzhavakh [Historical preconditions for the introduction of mediation in Ukraine and other countries]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo – Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i parvo, 4 [in Ukrainian].
Davyidenko, D. L. (2010). Primiritelnyie protseduryі і arbitrazh v Drevney Gretsii [Conciliation and Arbitration in Ancient Greece]. Treteyskiy sud – Treteiskyi sud, 5, 161–168 [in Ukrainian].
Berman, G. Dzh. (1998). Zapadnaya traditsiya prava: epoha formirovaniya [The Trap of the Tradition of Law: The Age of Formation]. Per. s angl. 2-e izd. Moskva [in Ukrainian].
Saksonskoe zertsalo. Pamyatnik, kommentarii, issledovaniya [Saxon mirror. Monument, commentary, research] (1985) / pod red. V. M. Koretskogo. Moskva, [in Ukrainian].
Lyuis, R.U. (2009). Florentsiya: istoriya goroda [Florence: history of the city] / Per. s angl. V. Kapustinoy. Moskva [in Russian].
Nestor, N.V. (2010). Pravo verehuliuvannia prymyrennia: istorychnyi pohliad [Legal regulation of reconciliation: a historical view]. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia: Pravo: nauk.-vyrob. Zhurn – Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia: Pravo: nauk.-vyrob. zhurn. Zaporizhzhia, 2, 165-168 [in Ukrainian].
Schavelov, A. S. (2007). Protsedura sezdaknyazey. Vostochnaya Evropa v drevnosti i srednevekove: politicheskie institutyi iverhovnaya vlast [Procedure for the Congress of Princes. Eastern Europe in Antiquity and the Middle Ages: Political Institutions and Sovereignty]. Moskva: Institut vseobschey istorii RAN [in Russian].
Statuty Velykohokniazivstva Lytovskoho [Statutes of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania]: u 3 t.; za red.. S. Kivalova, P. Muzychenka, A. Pankova. Odesa: Yuryd. l-ra, 2004. T. III. Kn. 2. Statut Velykoho kniazivstva Lytovskoho 1588 roku [in Ukrainian].
Krasilovska, Z. V. (2017). Stanovlennia instytutu mediatsii v systemi publichno houpravlinnia: teoretyko-pravovyiaspekt [Formation of the institute of mediation in the system of public administration: theoretical and legal aspect]: dys. … kand. naukderzh. upr. Odesa [in Ukrainian].
