Social and epistemological preconditions for the formation of security discourse in the history of political and legal thought
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2021.02.012Keywords:
security, primitive society, consciousness, security discourse, social preconditions, epistemological preconditionsAbstract
The aim of the article is to clarify the key social and epistemological preconditions for the formation of security discourse in the history of political and legal thought, which includes the search for the oldest origins of this discourse and patterns of its development in the pre-state era of human civilization. The key research methods are historical, historical-legal, comparative (comparative-legal), systemic, structural-functional, anthropological, etc.
Security issues played a key role in the search for optimal ways of survival of human society from the beginnings of early primitive society and in the socio-cultural organization of the primitive community, the ordering and stabilization of social relations. Permeating the entire life cycle of each primitive community, and over time - of each genus, tribe, the desire for a stable and secure existence became the starting point of social construction by people of the surrounding reality. Prerequisites for the emergence of security discourse in the history of political and legal thought should be considered as a set of social and epistemological conditions that allowed the emergence (emergence) of initial rational ideas about the relationship between security and danger in human life, their origin, security and subjects capable of it to ensure, for the further development of these ideas in the development of political and legal doctrines (doctrines) of subsequent historical periods. The formation of such a discourse, in terms of social preconditions, should be interpreted as a natural result of the complexity of social life, its separation from the natural and supernatural worlds, attempts to understand security as real and desirable, in terms of public interest, human protection from internal and external threats. Such preconditions can be considered the emergence of human society with its gradual social differentiation and structuring of subjects and objects of security. The epistemological preconditions of security discourse were the transition from subject-specific to abstract thinking, the formation of the first abstract logical "procategories", which generalized human life experience in the field of desirable, appropriate and safe, understanding the problem of security as universal for natural, social and supernatural (otherworldly) worlds. in the structure of mythological thinking.References
Kovalskyy, V.S. (2010). Okhoronna funktsiya prava [Protective function of law]. Kyiv: Yurynkom Inter [in Ukrainian].
Makarenko, L.O. (2019). Teoretyko-metodolohichni aspekty piznannya ta formuvannya pravovoyi kulʹtury [Theoretical and methodological aspects of cognition and formation of legal culture]. Doctor’s thesis. Instytut derzhavy i prava im. V.M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrayiny NAN Ukrayiny. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Kashanyna, T.V. (2004). Proyskhozhdenye hosudarstva y prava [Origin of state and law]. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola [in Russian].
Bandurka, O. M., Shvets, D. V., Burdin, M. Yu., Holovko O. M., et al. (2020). Istoriya derzhavy i prava zarubizhnykh krayin [History of the state and law of foreign countries]. Kharkiv : Maydan [in Ukrainian].
Veynberg, I.P. (1986). Chelovek v kulture drevnego Blizhnego Vostoka [Man in the culture of the ancient Middle East]. Moskva : Nauka, 1986. [in Russian].
Polikarpov, S.S. (2019). Prostranstvenno-vremennyye aspekty kartiny mira drevnikh indiytsev (po eposam «Makhabkharata» i «Ramayana») [Spatio-temporal aspects of the picture of the world of the ancient Indians (based on the epics «Mahabharata» and «Ramayana»)]. Candidate’s thesis. Yaroslavskiy gosudarstvennyy pedagogicheskiy universitet im. K.D. Ushinskogo. Yaroslavl [in Russian].
Lubskyy V.I. & Lubska M.V. (2004). Istoriya relihiy [History of religions]. Kyiv: Tsentr navchalnoyi literatury [in Ukrainian].
Frankfort, G., Uilson, D. & Yakobsen, T. (1984). V preddverii filosofii. Dukhovnyye iskaniya drevnego cheloveka [On the eve of philosophy. Spiritual quest of ancient man]. Moskva : Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy literatury [in Russian].
Alekseyev, V. P. & Pershits, A. I. (1990). Istoriya pervobytnogo obshchestva [The history of primitive society]. Moskva : Vysshaya shkola [in Russian].
Tokarev, S. A. (1990). Ranniye formy religii [Early forms of religion]. Moskva : Politizdat [in Russian].
Levi-Bryul, L. (1980). Pervobytnoye myshleniye Psikhologiya myshleniya [Primitive thinking Psychology of thinking]. Yu. B. Gippenreyter, V. V. Petukhova (ed.). Moskva : Izd-vo MGU [in Russian].
Levi-Stross, K. (2001). Strukturnaya antropologiya [Structural anthropology]. (V.V. Ivanova, Trans). Moskva : Izd-vo EKSMO-Press [in Russian].
Frankfort, G., Uilson, D. & Yakobsen, T. (1984). V preddverii filosofii. Dukhovnyye iskaniya drevnego cheloveka [On the eve of philosophy. Spiritual quest of ancient man]. Moskva : Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy literatury [in Russian].
Kopanchuk, V.O. (2020). Stanovlennya ta rozvytok derzhavnoyi polityky u sferi natsionalʹnoyi bezpeky ta okhorony hromadskoho poryadku v suchasnykh hlobalizatsiynykh umovakh [Formation and development of state policy in the field of national security and protection of public order in modern globalization]. Kharkiv: NUTSZU [in Ukrainian].
Belyaev, V. P. & Chapchykov, S. Yu. (2017). Natsyonalna bezopasnost: doktrynalʹnye podkhody k opredelenyyu ponyatyya [National security: doctrinal approaches to the definition of the concept]. Nauka y obrazovanye : khozyaystvo y ékonomyka; predprynymatelʹstvo; pravo y upravlenye – Science and education: economy and economics; entrepreneurship; law and governance, 3. Retrievd from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28407848 [in Russian].
Vozzhennikov, A. (2000). Natsional'naya bezopasnost: teoriya, politika, strategiya [National security: theory, politics, strategy]. Moskva : Modul [in Russian].
Alekseyev, V. P. & Pershits, A. I. (2007). Istoriya pervobytnogo obshchestva [The history of primitive society]. Moskva : Ast ; Astrel [in Russian].
Zaêts, A. P. (2018). Pervisne suspilstvo i pravo [Primitive society and law]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Yurydychni nauky – Scientific notes of NaUKMA. Legal sciences. Tom 2 13-19 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2018.13-19
Parakhonskyy, B .O. & Yavorska H. M. (2019). Ontolohiya viyny i myru: bezpeka, stratehiya, smysl [Ontology of war and peace: security, strategy, meaning]. Kyiv: NISD [in Ukrainian].
Solovev, V. S. (1989). Fylosofskye nachala tselnoho znanyya [Philosophical principles of integral knowledge], Vol 2. Moskva : Polytyzdat [in Russian].
Dzobanya, O. P., eds. (2021). Natsionalna bezpeka: svitohlyadni ta teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady [National security: worldview and theoretical and methodological principles]. Kharkiv : Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Eliade, M. (2000). Izbrannyye sochineniya: Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii; Obrazy i simvoly; Svyashchennoye i mirskoye [Selected Works: The Myth of Eternal Return; Images and symbols; Sacred and secular]. Moskva : Ladomir [in Russian].
Zhirar, R. (2010). Nasiliye i svyashchennoye [Violence and sacred]. Moskva : Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye [in Russian].
Kayua, R. (2003). Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakralnoye [Myth and man. Man and the sacred]. Moskva : OGI [in Russian].
Moss, M. (2000). Sotsialnyye funktsii svyashchennogo. Izbrannyye proizvedeniya [Social functions of the sacred. Selected works]. I.V. Utekhina (Ed.). Sankt-Peterburg : Yevraziya [in Russian].
Otto, R. (2008). Svyashchennoye. Ob irratsionalnom v ideye bozhestvennogo i yego sootnoshenii s ratsionalnym [Sacred. On the irrational in the idea of the divine and its relationship with the rational]. (A. M. Rutkevich, Trans). Sankt-Peterburg : Izd-vo S.-Peterburgskogo un-ta [in Russian].
Berger, P. & Lukman, T. (1995). Sotsialnoye konstruirovaniye real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya [Social construction of reality. A treatise on the sociology of knowledge]. (Ye. Rutkevich,Trans). Moskva : Medum [in Russian].
Dmitrakov, A. M. (2018). Kontsept «bezopasnost» v filosofii kul'tury i sotsial'no-gumanitarnom znanii [The concept of security" in the philosophy of culture and social and humanitarian knowledge]. Nauchnyye vedomosti BelGU. Ser. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo. Scientific Bulletin of BelSU. Ser. Philosophy. Sociology. Law. T. 43, 1, 176-181. [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.18413/2075-4566-2018-43-1-176-181
Nemirovskiy, A.A. (2009). «Yesli tsar s zakonoustanovleniyem strany ne schitayetsya...». Pravitel', poddannyye i norma v vavilono-assiriyskom mire ["If the king does not consider the law of the country ...». The ruler, subjects and the norm in Babylon-assyrian world. The ruler and his subjects: the socio-cultural norm and the limitations of sole power.]. Pravitel i yego poddannyye: sotsiokulturnaya norma i ogranicheniya yedinolichnoy vlasti – The ruler and his subjects: the socio-cultural norm and the limitations of sole power. Moskva : Institut Afriki RAN, pp. 44-78 [in Russian].
Kradin, N. N. (1995). Vozhdestvo : sovremennoye sostoyaniye i problemy izucheniya [Chiefdom: current status and problems of study]. Ranniye formy politicheskoy organizatsii: ot pervobytnosti k gosudarstvennosti – Early forms of political organization: from primitiveness to statehood. Popov V.A. (Ed.), pp.11-61). Moskva : Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN [in Russian].
Rybakov, G. L., Yakobson, V. A. (Eds.) (2002). Istoriya Vostoka [History of the East]. Vostok v drevnosti – East in antiquity, 1, (pp.688). Moskva : Vostochnaya literatura.
Pershits. A. I. (1979). Problemy normativnoy etnografii [Problems of Normative Ethnography]. Issledovaniya po obshchey etnografii. Moskva : Nauka, 1979. S. 210-240 [in Russian].
Mayorov, N. I. (2003). Vvedeniye v istoriyu Drevnego Vostoka [Introduction to the history of the Ancient East]. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo universiteta [in Russian].
Zhukov, V. N. (2009). Vvedeniye v yuridicheskuyu aksiologiyu (voprosy metodologii) [Introduction to legal axiology (methodological issues)]. Gosudarstvo i pravo State and law, 6, 20–31 [in Russian].Veynberg I.P. (1993).
Veynberh, I. P. (1993). Rozhdeniye istorii. Istoricheskaya mysl na Blizhnem Vostoke serediny I tysyacheletiya do n.e. [The birth of history. Historical thought in the Middle East in the middle of the 1st millennium BC]. Moskva : Nauka [in Russian].
Levyash, I. YA. (2011). Otkrytoye obshchestvo : ot granitsy k frontiru [Open Society: From Border to Frontier]. Sotsiologichesky al'manakh Sociological almanac, 2, pp. 69-80. Minsk : Belaruskaya navuka [in Belarus].
Dzoban O. & Manuylov E. (2016). Problema bezpeki u ranníkh formakh í̈í̈ usvídomlennya [The problem of safety in early forms of learning]. Vísnik Kyivskogo natsíonal'nogo torgovelno-yekonomíchnogo uníversitetu. Naukoviy zhurnal – Bulletin of the Kiev National Trade and Economic University. Science journal, 2 (106), 40-52 [in Ukrainian].
