Judicial doctrine of legal consequences in tax disputes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2021.04.044Keywords:
tax disputes, regulatory authorities, tax relations, court doctrineAbstract
The article considers the analysis of the role of judicial doctrine of legal consequences in tax disputes.
Building the rule of law and creating a qualitatively new society in Ukraine has become a task, the formation and implementation of which directly depend on the subjects of power and their coordinated bilateral dialogue with the people as a source of power.
At one of these stages of legal development, the Tax Code of Ukraine was adopted, which created the preconditions for the formation of new views of lawyers and judges on the content and form of judicial activity and the use of doctrinal approaches to justice, respectively, and the process of improving legislation, including tax , the components of which must be in accordance with the constitutional principles of building such a state governed by the rule of law, has become continuous and has reached a significant level of transparency.
In conclusion, the author notes that in view of our position on the doctrine of legal effect in tax disputes, as a mandatory component of legal regulation or appeal of actions, decisions or inaction of regulatory authorities and their officials, we propose steps out of the "vicious circle" by development of mechanisms for out-of-court settlement of tax disputes in terms of appealing the inclusion of taxpayers in the list of risky, and settlement of tax disputes in general.
Undoubtedly, the improvement of legislative regulation on the above issues will increase the quality and efficiency of the mechanism, will protect the rights and legitimate interests of the subjects (participants) in the field of tax relations.
References
Podatkovyi kodeks Ukrainy : Zakon Ukrainy vid 02 hrudnia 2010 r. № 2755-VI (u redaktsii vid 01 lypnia 2020 r.) [Data Code of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine type 02 hrudnia 2010 r. № 2755-VI (edited on July 1, 2020)]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17 [in Ukrainian].
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam 50 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo ofitsiinoho tlumachennia okremykh polozhen chastyny pershoi statti 4 Tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy (sprava pro okhoroniuvanyi zakonom interes) vid 1 hrudnia 2004 roku (sprava № 1-10/2004, rishennia № 18-rp/2004) [Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam 50 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo ofitsiinoho tlumachennia okremykh polozhen chastyny pershoi statti 4 Tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy (sprava pro okhoroniuvanyi spy № 18-rp / 2004)]. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v018p710-04#Text [in Ukrainian].
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu u skladi kolehii suddiv Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu vid 28 liutoho 2019 roku (sprava № 522/3665/17) [Resolution of the Supreme Court in the composition of the Collegium of Judges Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu vid 28 February 2019 (case № 522/3665/17)]. URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80167902 [in Ukrainian].
Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu u skladi kolehii suddiv Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu vid 17 lypnia 2020 roku (sprava № 280/1098/19). URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/90458281 [Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu u skladi kolehii suddiv Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu vid 17 lypnia 2020 roku (sprava № 280/1098/19)] URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/90458281 [in Ukrainian].
Biletska, H. M. Okremi aspekty zastosuvannia sudovykh doktryn pry rozkrytti podatkovykh zlochyniv: svitovi ta istorychni tendentsii [Certain aspects of the application of judicial doctrines in the disclosure of criminal data: worlds and historical tendencies]. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Fp_2013_2_3 [in Ukrainian].
Bondarenko, O. M. Shliakhy vdoskonalennia pravovoho rehuliuvannia pozasudovoho vyrishennia podatkovykh sporiv [Shliakhy vdoskonalennia pravovoho rehuliuvannia pozasudovoho vyrishennia podatykh sporiv]. URL: http://pjv.nuoua.od.ua/v3-1_2019/15.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Hvozdii, V., Kalnytska I., Mysnyk N. [ta in.]. Metodychni rekomendatsii z podatkovoho prava [Metodychni rekomendatsii z podatkovoho prava]. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vapny_2013_2_9 [in Ukrainian].
Huze, K. A. Predstavnytstvo prokurorom interesiv hromadianyna abo derzhavy v tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy [Predstavnytstvo prokurorom interesiv hromadianyna abo derzhavy v tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy]. URL: http://nauka.nlu.edu.ua/download/diss/Guze/d_Guze.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Yevhrafova, Ye. Doktryna u pravovii nautsi yurydychnii praktytsi [Doktryna u pravovii nautsi yurydychnii praktytsi]. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vapny_2013_2_9 [in Ukrainian].
Sobota, K. (2013). Pryntsyp pravnoi derzhavy: konstytutsiino-pravni ta administratyvno-pravni aspekty [Pryntsyp pravnoi derzhavy: konstytutsiino-pravni ta administratyvno-pravni aspekty]. Pereklad z nim. Ryzhkov H., Blashchuk O., Tatarchuk K.. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Kravchuk, V. M. Chy ye bezmezhnym pravo na zakhyst v administratyvnomu sudi [Chy ye bezmezhnym right to zakhyst in administratyvnomu court]. URL: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pres-centr/zmi/659965/ [in Ukrainian].
Semenikhin, I. V. Pravova doktryna: poniattia, oznaky, struktura [Legal doctrine: poniattia, marks, structure]. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/233584168.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Slidenko, A. V. Zakhyst interesiv platnykiv podatkiv pry zastosuvanni zakhodiv podatkovoho prymusu [Zakhyst interesiv platnykiv podatkiv pry zastosuvanni zakhodiv podatkovoho prymusu]. URL: http://nauka.nlu.edu.ua/download/diss/Slidenko/d_Slidenko.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Smychok, Ye. M. Sudova doktryna podatkovykh vyhod [Judicial doctrine of data output]. URL: http://www.pdu-journal.kpu.zp.ua/archive/3_2020/8.pdf [in Ukrainian].
