Essence and legal nature of restriction of rights owner's rights in the system of copyright and related rights

Authors

  • Oleh Viyvanko West Ukrainian National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/app2021.04.066

Keywords:

intellectual property rights, exclusive rights, restrictions of rights, property rights to intellectual property

Abstract

Legal protection of intellectual property is based on exclusive rights, which allow the subject to exercise in respect of a particular object of authority to own, use and dispose of it. According to Art. 418 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, such a right is inviolable, because no one can be deprived of it or restricted in its exercise, except in cases clearly defined by law. These restrictions are usually imposed in the public or state interest. Thus, the legislation of Ukraine allows for the restriction of rights in emergency situations (epidemic, catastrophe, natural disaster, etc.). Under these conditions, their use is allowed without the permission of the copyright holder, but with the mandatory payment of compensation. Thus, subjective rights are usually limited to the benefit of state, public and public interests.

Any restrictions, termination, revocation of subjective rights are applied solely by law. Most often, such restrictions apply to property rights to intellectual property rights. These limitations are significant.

The monopoly of the right holder provides an opportunity to prohibit the use of objects to which the rights belong to him. However, in order to establish a balance between its interests and the interests of society, the state law allows the restriction of rights to intellectual property, which do not create significant obstacles to the realization of property rights and the legitimate interests of intellectual property rights.

The limit of law is all the possibilities that a person is able to acquire for himself in connection with the legal definition of his natural rights. Restriction of the right is, as a rule, actions of the third party which are directed on impossibility of realization by the subject of the rights in full.

The purpose of the article is to define the concept and essence of restriction of rights, their role in the exercise of intellectual property rights.

References

Michurin, Ye. O. (2009). Obmezhennia mainovykh prav fizychnykh osib (tsyvilno-pravovyi aspekt) [Restriction of property rights of individuals (civil law aspect)]: avtoref. dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.03. Kyiv [in Ukrainian]

Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Civil Code of Ukraine]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text [in Ukrainian]

Pro avtorske pravo i sumizhni prava [On Copyright and Related Rights]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 23 hrudnia 1993 roku № 3792-XII. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3792-12#Text [in Ukrainian]

Pro efektyvne upravlinnia mainovymy pravamy pravovlasnykiv u sferi avtorskoho prava i (abo) sumizhnykh prav [On effective management of property rights of copyright holders in the field of copyright and (or) related rights]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 15 travnia 2018 roku № 2415-VIII. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2415-19#Text [in Ukrainian]

Pro okhoronu prav na promyslovi zrazky [On protection of industrial design rights]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 15 hrudnia 1993 roku № 3688-XII. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3688-12#Text [in Ukrainian]

Sorvachov, O. V. Obmezhennia, prypynennia i skasuvannia mainovykh prav intelektualnoi vlasnosti na promyslovi zrazky [Restriction, termination and revocation of intellectual property rights to industrial designs]. Retrieved from http://pravoisuspilstvo.org.ua/archive/2012/5_2012/16.pdf [in Ukrainian]

Meniailo, L. (2004). Pro poriadok obmezhennia prava vlasnyka obiekta intelektualnoi vlasnosti [On the procedure for restricting the rights of the owner of intellectual property]. Intelektualna vlasnist – Intellectual Property, 4, 39-41 [in Ukrainian]

Aral Tekin and Aral v. Turkey: Commission Decision. 14.01.1998. App. 24563/94. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-4064 [in Ukrainian]

Blazhivska, N. (2018). Obmezhennia prav intelektualnoi vlasnosti vidpovidno do praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny [Restrictions on intellectual property rights in accordance with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights]. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti – Theory and practice of IP, 6, 133-141 [in Ukrainian]

Semkiv, V. O. & Shandra, R. S. (2015). Intelektualna vlasnist: pidruchnyk dlia studentiv neiurydychnykh fakultetiv [Intellectual property: a textbook for students of non-law faculties]. Lviv: Halytskyi drukar [in Ukrainian]

Published

2022-03-17

Issue

Section

CIVIL LAW AND CIVIL PROCESS. FAMILY LAW. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW. COMMERCIAL LAW. COMMERCIAL-PROCEDURAL LAW.

How to Cite

Viyvanko, Oleh. “Essence and Legal Nature of Restriction of Rights owner’s Rights in the System of Copyright and Related Rights”. Actual Problems of Law, no. 4, Mar. 2022, pp. 66-71, https://doi.org/10.35774/app2021.04.066.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 304

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.