The reasonableness of the terms of consideration of the case by the court in the civil process: problematic issues

Authors

  • Nataliia Bachunska West Ukrainian National University
  • Victoriia Yarmus West Ukrainian National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/app2023.03.039

Keywords:

reasonable term, the principle of reasonableness of the term of consideration of the case by the court, timeliness, time of consideration of the case, procedural terms, principles of civil procedure, civil process

Abstract

The study of the article is aimed at a comprehensive study of the principle of reasonableness of the terms of consideration of the case by the court in the civil process. Domestic legislation, international legal acts, national judicial practice, practice of the European Court of Human Rights and recommendations of the European Commission on the efficiency of justice were analyzed.

The principle of reasonableness of the terms of consideration of the case by the court is aimed at ensuring the timely administration of justice. Non-observance of established procedural terms will be a violation of the rights and legitimate interests of a person, therefore, analysis of the establishment and application of the principle of reasonableness of terms is necessary.

The term is considered reasonable, if the time provided is sufficient, taking into account the circumstances of the case, for the execution of a procedural action, and corresponds to the task of civil proceedings.

The article discusses the criteria for determining the reasonableness of terms, which is relevant for the administration of justice both in Ukraine and in foreign countries. Having considered the legal positions in the decisions of the ECtHR, it was concluded that the establishment of a reasonable period in the behavior of the applicant and the relevant authorities. Thus, ensuring the principle of reasonableness by the court is quite a difficult task, because it requires taking into account all circumstances (both objective and subjective factors).

Unsatisfactory organization of the court process is seen as the reason for the violation of the procedural terms, since neglecting the study of the case, improper study of the materials, untimely notification of the participants at the preparatory stages causes an increase in the time of consideration of the case, because subsequently the meetings are repeatedly postponed.

An analysis of the recommendations of the European Commission on the efficiency of justice was carried out, on the basis of which a solution to the problem of too long consideration of cases was proposed for the implementation of quality monitoring and a reliable analysis of the time of consideration of civil cases, the number of courts considering these cases, their workload, etc.

References

Tsyvilnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 18.03.2004 №1618-IV (2004). Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Ofitsiinyi vebportal parlamentu Ukrainy – Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618 [in Ukrainian].

Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine]: Zakon vid 28.06.1996 №254k/96-VR (1996). Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Ofitsiinyi vebportal parlamentu Ukrainy – Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254 [in Ukrainian].

Kokhanska, M. L. (2019). Protsesualni zasoby zabezpechennia efektyvnosti tsyvilnoho sudochynstva [Procedural means of ensuring the effectiveness of civil proceedings]: avtoref. dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.03 Kharkiv. Retrieved from http://dspace.univd.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/5883 [in Ukrainian].

Pro sudoustrii ta status suddiv [On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 № 1402-VIII (2016). Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Ofitsiinyi vebportal parlamentu Ukrainy – Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine. 2016. Retrieved fromhttps://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text [in Ukrainian].

Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod (z protokolamy) (Yevropeiska konventsiia z prav liudyny) [Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (with Protocols) (European Convention on Human Rights)]. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Ofitsiinyi vebportal parlamentu Ukrainy. Ofitsiinyi vebportal parlamentu Ukrainy – Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text [in Ukrainian].

Pro vykonannia rishen ta zastosuvannia praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny [On the implementation of decisions and application of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 23.02.2006 № 3477-IV. Verkhovna rada Ukrainy. Ofitsiinyi vebportal parlamentu Ukrainy – Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15#Text [in Ukrainian].

Sprava «Smirnova proty Ukrainy» (Zaiava № 36655/02) [The case «Smirnova v. Ukraine» (Application No. 36655/02)]. Ofitsiinyi vebportal parlamentu Ukrainy – Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/980_440#Text [in Ukrainian].

Sprava «Fedina proti Ukrainy (Zaiava № 17185/02) [The case «Fedina v. Ukraine» (Application No. 17185/02)]. Ofitsiinyi vebportal parlamentu Ukrainy – Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_802#Text [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho sudu u spravi №9901/120/19 vid 12 veresnia 2019 roku [Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No.9901/120/19 of September 12, 2019]. Yedynyi derzhavnyi reestr sudovykh rishen – Unified state register of court decisions. Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/84941706 [in Ukrainian].

Pro deiaki pytannia dotrymannia rozumnykh strokiv rozghlyadu sudamy tsyvilnykh, kryminalnykh sprav i sprav pro administratyvni pravoporushennia [On some issues of compliance with reasonable deadlines for consideration of civil, criminal cases and cases of administrative offenses by courts]: Postanova Plenumu Vyshchoho spetsializovanoho sudu z rozghlyadu tsyvilnykh ta kryminalnykh sprav vid 17.10.2014 № 11. Ofitsiinyi vebportal parlamentu Ukrainy – Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0011740-14#Text [in Ukrainian].

European judicial systems CEPEJ Evaluation Report. 2022 Evaluation cycle (2020 data). Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/special-file-report-european-judicial-systems-cepej-evaluation-report-2022-evaluation-cycle-2020-data-?p_p_id=56_INSTANCE_Pec933yX8xS5&p_p_lifecycle=0&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&p_p_col_id=column-4&p_p_col_pos=1&p_p_col_count=2 [in English].

CEPEJ Guidelines on judicial statistics (GOJUST) adopted by the CEPEJ at its 12th plenary meeting (Strasbourg, 10 – 11 December 2008). Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/1680747678 [in English].

Published

2023-12-08

Issue

Section

CIVIL LAW AND CIVIL PROCESS. FAMILY LAW. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW. COMMERCIAL LAW. COMMERCIAL-PROCEDURAL LAW.

How to Cite

Bachunska, Nataliia, and Victoriia Yarmus. “The Reasonableness of the Terms of Consideration of the Case by the Court in the Civil Process: Problematic Issues”. Actual Problems of Law, no. 3, Dec. 2023, pp. 39-44, https://doi.org/10.35774/app2023.03.039.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 582

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.