Application of artificial intelligence technologies in criminal proceedings: realities and prospects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/Keywords:
criminal proceedings, justice, judicial decision, artificial intelligence, digitalizationAbstract
The article analyses certain problems that arise in the process of applying artificial intelligence technologies in criminal proceedings. It is stated that different states are at different stages of integrating artificial intelligence technologies into criminal proceedings. The example of China is given as an absolute leader in this process, which has introduced a system of «smart courts» (Smart Court SoS). At the same time, a much more cautious approach of European states is demonstrated, it focused primarily on compliance with the principles of the rule of law, non-discrimination, independence and impartiality of the judiciary, the right to a fair trial, the right to privacy and protection of personal data, the right to freedom of expression, etc. It is concluded that the integration of AI technologies into criminal proceedings can potentially improve the quality, efficiency and effectiveness of judicial proceedings, but provided that a number of risks of a technical, legal and ethical nature are eliminated. One of the unresolved problems today remains the ability of artificial intelligence systems to create fake legal facts or norms that look plausible (so-called «legal hallucinations»). At the same time, significant potential for the use of AI technologies exists at the stage of pre-trial investigation, in particular, for the rapid processing of large databases and information arrays and the performance of identification tasks (recognition of faces, voices, fingerprints, license plates, etc.). The regulatory acts on the possibility of introducing and using artificial intelligence in criminal proceedings in Ukraine are analysed. In particular, justice is attributed to the priority areas in which the tasks of the state policy for the development of the field of artificial intelligence are implemented.
References
1. Rozumni sudy u Kytai: yak vony pratsiuiut ta chomu suddi maiut radytys zi shtuchnym intelektom [Smart courts in China: how they work and why judges should consult with artificial intelligence]. Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/arMbUmoU [in Ukrainian]
2. Shi, Ch., Sourdin, T. & Li, B. (2021). The Smart Court – A New Pathway to Justice in China? International Journal for Court Administration, 12/1. Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/WrMncz7U [in English].
3. Oboronova, I. V. (2023). Dyferentsiatsiia kryminalnoho provadzhennia v sudi pershoi instantsii [Differentiation of criminal proceedings in the court of first instance]: dys. … dokt. filos.: 081 Pravo. Khmelnytskyi [in Ukrainian]
4. Demianchuk, O. Shtuchnyi intelekt u pravosuddi: revoliutsiia chy evoliutsiia? [Artificial Intelligence in Justice: Revolution or Evolution?]. Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/qrMbUGkd [in Ukrainian]
5. Dahl, M., Magesh, V., Suzgun, M. & Ho, D. E. (2024). Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models. Journal of Legal Analysis, 16/1, 64-93 [in English]
6. Magesh, V., Surani, F., Dahl, M., Suzgun, M., Manning, C. D. & Ho, D. E. (2025). Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI. Legal Research Tools. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 22/2, 216-242 [in English]
7. USShA advokata oshtrafuvaly na 10000 dolariv za feikovi tsytaty u sudovomu dokumenti, zghenerovani ChatGPT [In the US, a lawyer was fined $10,000 for fake quotes in a court document generated by ChatGPT]. Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/qrMb1gBj [in Ukrainian]
8. Reiling, D. & Papagianneas, S. (2025). Lessons from China’s Smart Court Reform. International Journal for Court Administration, 16/1. Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/LrMn6KXB [in English]
9. Derkach, V. H., Prokopovych-Tkachenko, Ye. D. & Rudenko, Ye. H. (2025). Vykorystannia shtuchnoho intelektu v sudovomu protsesi Ukrainy: pravovi, etychni ta protsesualni aspekty [The use of artificial intelligence in the judicial process of Ukraine: legal, ethical and procedural aspects]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal – Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 3, 460-464 [in Ukrainian]
10. CCJE Opinion № 26 (2023) «Moving forward: the use of assistive technology in the judiciary». Consultative Council of European judges. Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/mrNmCDht [in English]
11. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj [in English]
12. Kontseptsiia rozvytku shtuchnoho intelektu v Ukraini [Concept of artificial intelligence development in Ukraine], skhvalena rozporiadzhenniam Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 02 hrudnia 2020 r. № 1556-r. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-2020-%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian]
13. Kodeks suddivskoi etyky [Code of Judicial Ethics], zatverdzhenyi rishenniam zizdu suddiv Ukrainy 18 veresnia 2024 r. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/n0001415-24#n2 [in Ukrainian]
14. Bernaziuk, Ya. Shtuchnyi intelekt yak osnova tsyfrovoho sudochynstva: pomichnyk chy maibutnii konkurent suddi? [Artificial intelligence as the basis of digital justice: assistant or future competitor to the judge?]. Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/BrNn15tb [in Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
							


