The role and value of the principle of the rule of law in administrative and business relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2017.04.170Keywords:
principle of rule of law, administrative and delict relations, principles of regulation of administrative and delict relationsAbstract
In this article, the role and significance of the rule of law in administrative and delict relations, as well as its place among other principles of law, are explored. On the basis of the analysis of the domestic principles of the rule of law principle, its components have been investigated, and through the study of international legal norms, new components of it have been identified and proposed for implementation. The attention was paid to the necessity of expanded legislative consolidation of the principle of the rule of law and its constituent elements in the proper manner in the course of the drafting of the administrative-delict code of Ukraine. A number of cases brought to the European Court of Human Rights have been analyzed. It was concluded that the principle of the rule of law in its essence includes all other principles that could be attributed to the principles of administrative and tort relations. In view of the necessity and the utmost importance of observance of the rule of law principle, in our opinion, it should be fixed in the codified normative legal acts (in the Administrative Tort Code). And in order to avoid any misunderstandings and its free interpretation, all its components should be recordedReferences
Case of Maestri v. Italy, no.39748/98, 2004, § 30 [European Court of Human Rights]. (n.d.) hudoc.echr.coe.int. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ [in English].
Rishennya Konstitutsiynogo Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstitutsiynim podannyam Upovnovajenogo Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy z prav lyudiny vid 29 chervnya 2010 roku № 17-rp/2010 [The decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case of the constitutional petition of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights on the compliance of the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) with the paragraph of the eighth paragraph 5 of part one of Article 11 of the Law of Ukraine «On the Militia» of June 29, 2010, No. 17-pn / 2010]. (2010, June 29). Official Bulletin of Ukraine. – 2010. – No. 52. – p. 25. – Art. 1746 [in Ukrainian].
Pidvalna, M. Z. Problemy zastosuvannya printsypu verkhovenstva prava [Problems of applying the rule of law principle]. University scientific notes, 2012. – № 3 (43). – C. 17. [in Ukrainian].
Dopovid Evropeuskoi komisii "Za demokratiyu cherez pravo" (Venetsiyska komisiya) [Report of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), endorsed by the Venice Commission at the 86th plenary meeting] (Venice, March 25–26, 2011), § 16 Retrieved from http://www.scourt.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
Baranchiyk, P. D. Printsipi verkhovenstva prava [The rule of law as a fundamental principle of the rule of law]. Vistnyk Zaporizkogo natsionalnogo universitetu. Retrieved from http://www.stattionline.org.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
Kodeks administratyvnogo sudochinstva [Code of Administrative Justice] (2005, July 6). № 158. Holos Ukrainy – The Voise of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
Podkovenko, T. O., Pavelko L. V. (2015). Printsipi yuridichnoi vidpovidalnosti: zagalnoteoretichniy aspect [Principles of legal liability: the general theoretical aspect]. Molodiy vcheniy -Young scientist 2 (17), 832 [in Ukrainian].
Kodeks Ukrainy pro administrativni pravoporushennya [Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses]. (1984, December 7). № 8073X. Vidomosty Verkhovnoi Rady URSR Information from the Verkhovna Rada of the URSR [in Ukrainian].
Boyko, D. V. Pravoprimenitelnoe usmotrenie, zakonnost i proizvol (2009) [Legitimate discretion, legality and arbitrariness] Obschestvo i pravo – Society and Law 3 (25), 17 [in Russian].
Case of Lhermitte v. Belgium, no. 34238/09, 2016, §67 [European Court of Human Rights]. (n.d.) hudoc.echr.coe.int. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ [in English].
Case of Saadi v. United Kingdom, no. 13229/03, 2008, § 31 [European Court of Human Rights]. (n.d.) hudoc.echr.coe.int. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ [in English].
Case of Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland, no. 5809/08, 2016, § 145 [European Court of Human Rights]. (n.d.) hudoc.echr.coe.int. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ [in English].
Case of Golder v. United Kingdom, no. 4451/70, 1975 [European Court of Human Rights]. (n.d.) hudoc.echr.coe.int. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ [in English].
Ostafiychuk, L. A. (2016). Zabezpechennya prava na dustup do pravosuddya v ukrainskomu zakonodavstvi [Ensuring the right to access to justice in Ukrainian legislation]. Actualni problemi vitchiznyanoi yurisprudentsii – Actual problems of domestic jurisprudence, 6 (1), 145 [in Ukrainian].
Khristova, G. O. (2012). Pozitivni zobovyazannya derjavi u sferi prav lyudini yak noviy napryam doslidjennya u vitchuznyaniy teoretichniy yurisprudentsii [Positive obligations of the state in the field of human rights as a new direction in research in domestic theoretical jurisprudence]. Visnik Academii pravovyh nauk Ukrainy – Herald of the Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 2 (69), 30 in Ukrainian].
Zakon Ukrainy Pro zasadi zapobigannya ta protidii dyskriminatsii v Ukraini: pyiniatyi 6 ver. 2012 roku No 185 [The Law of Ukraine on the Principles of Prevention and Counteraction of Discrimination in Ukraine from September 6 2012, № 185] (2012, September 6). Holos Ukrainy – Voice of Ukraine, 185 [in Ukrainian].
