The Authority of Justice VS Freedom of Expression of Views (the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2018.03.045Keywords:
freedom of expression, justice, judicial power, respect to the court, courts authority, ECHR practice, legal positions of the ECHR, the limits of admissible criticism of the court and judges.Abstract
The article is devoted to the research of the borders of freedom of speech and freedom of expression in view of the need to preserve authority and respect to the court, because respect to the judiciary ensures the effective justice, guarantees stability, peace and tranquility in the state. In particular, a definition and theoretical generalization of the legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights in the established field was made on the materials of the cases «Kobenter and Standard Verlags GMBH v. Austria», «Skalkа v. Poland», «Pinto Coelho v. Portugal», «Nicula v. Finland», «Amihalakioaev v. Moldova», «Casado Koka v. Spain», «Schopfer v. Switzerland», «Morice v. France».References
Stashkiv, N.M. (2018) Svoboda vyrazhennia pohliadiv ta povaha do sudu v konteksti praktyky Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny (teoretychne uzahalnennia rishen u spravakh "Barfod proty Danii", "Praher i Obershlik proty Avstrii", "De Khaes i Hiisels proty Belhii", "Perna proty Italii") [Freedom of expression and respect to the judiciary in the context of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights (theoretical generalization of decisions on the cases of "Barfod v. Denmark", "Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria", "De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium", "Perna v. Italy")]. Aktualni problemy pravoznavstva Actual problems of law. 2 (14). 23-29. [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.35774/app2018.02.023
Sprava "Kobenter i "Shtandard Ferlahs HmbKh" proty Avstrii" [Case of Kobenter and Standard Verlags GMBH v. Austria] – Retrieved from: http://www.durex-promo.ru/index.php?ds=1424108 [in Russian].
Sprava "Skalka proty Polshchi" [Case of Skalka v. Poland] – Retrieved from: http://www.consultant.ru/cons/ cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB&n=20124#0 [in Russian].
Sprava "Nikula proty Finliandii" [Case of Nicula v. Finland] – Retrieved from: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/980_042 [in Ukrainian].
Sprava "Pinto Koelo proty Portuhalii" [Case of Pinto Coelho v. Portugal] – Retrieved from: http://www. consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB002&n=473585#06315108296170371 [in Russian].
Sprava "Amikhalakioaie proty Moldovy" [Case of Amihalachioaie v. Moldova] – Retrieved from: http:// cedem.org.ua/library/sprava-amihalakioae-proty-moldovy/ [in Ukrainian].
Sprava "Kasado Koka proty Ispanii" [Case of Casado Coca v. Spain] – Retrieved from: europeancourt.ru/ resheniya-evropejskogo-suda-na-russkom-yazyke/kasado-koka-protiv-ispanii-postanovlenie-evropejskogosuda/ [in Russian].
Sprava "Shopfer proty Shveitsarii" [Case of Schopfer v. Switzerland] – Retrieved from: http://www.consultant. ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=ARB;n=463124#0 [in Russian].
Sprava "Moris proty Frantsii" [Case of Morice v. France] – Retrieved from: https://precedent.in.ua/2016/12/09/ moris-proty-frantsiyi / [in Ukrainian].
