Procedural Requirements for the Expert’s Opinion in Criminal Proceedings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2018.03.099Keywords:
expert opinion, procedural source of evidence, expert, affiliation, admissibility, authenticity, sufficiency, competence, competence.Abstract
The article deals with the procedural features of the formation, verification and evaluation of the expert’s conclusion. Proposed separate additions to the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine on the order of involving an expert by the parties to the criminal proceedings.References
Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [The Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine]. (n.d.). zakon.rada. gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17 [in Ukrainian].
Ozhehgov, S.I. (1995). Tolkovyi slovar russkoho Yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language]. Moskva: Az [in Ukrainian].
Davydova, D.V., & Volobuieva O.O. (2015). Vysnovok eksperta Yak protsesualne dzherelo dokaziv: okremi aspekty teorii ta praktyky [The expert’s conclusion as a procedural source of evidence: some aspects of theory and practice]. Organizatsiino-pravovi aspety dosudovogo slidstva- Organizational-legal aspects of pre-trial investigation ,2, 151-154 [in Ukrainian].