Conceptualization of legal reality structure and location of law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2019.02.026Keywords:
ontology of law, legal reality, legal law, philosophy of law, civil law and orderAbstract
The article examines the phenomenon of legal reality, as the basis of the deontological being of society and the level of compliance of the legal law with the universal laws of being; analyzes the fundamental principles of the emergence and structure of legal reality; interdependencies between natural law and current legal reality are monitored; the idea that any definition of law contains an ontological basis is substantiated.
The article focuses on the fact that the rethinking of laws in modern legal science is formed on the basis of philosophical approaches, among which the most important place is just the right reality as the highest form of systematization of the theory of legal knowledge. System analysis of the law in the structure of legal reality measures the formal implementation of the law of verified decisions.
The author concludes that further development of the philosophical understanding of the legal law will go towards enriching its present understanding, which will be synchronized with the ever deeper knowledge in the anthropological, philosophical, social and legal dimensions. The invariability of the fundamental principles of the construction of legal laws is rooted in the fact of their rooting in the transcendental-axiological dimension.
Consequently, the relationship between law and law has existed for many years and still exists. This problem was considered both at the international level and at the domestic, modern level. In Ukraine, this issue is relevant and nowadays, which causes great interest and exacerbates the tension in society.
This problem is not so much theoretical, as most scholars point out, how practical is it in the process of law-making, law enforcement and law enforcement, since not all laws created by the state, or rather state bodies, have legal content, but sometimes in general they are contrary to it. Therefore, now it is necessary to clearly distinguish between such concepts as legal and illegal law and to understand when the law loses the right to be called illegal, and therefore illegitimate.References
Kistyakovskiy, B.A. (1998). Filosofiya i sotsiologiya prava [Philosophy and sociology of law].Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatelstvo Russkogo Khristianskogo instituta [in Russia].
Maksimov, S.I. (2002). Pravovaya realnost: opyt filosofskogo osmysleniya: monografiya [Legal reality: the experience of philosophical reflection: a monograph]. Kharkov Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Kostytskyy, M.V. (2008). Filosofski ta psykholohichni problemy yurysprudentsiyi: Vybrani naukovi pratsi [Philosophical and Psychological Problems of Law: Vibranes on Science]. Chernivtsi: Ruta [in Ukrainian].
Alekseyev, S.S. (1981). Obshchaya teoriya prava: v 2-h t. [General theory of law: in 2 tons]. Moskva: Yuridicheskaya literature [in Russia].
Maksymov, S. I. (2010). Filosofiya prava: suchasni interpretatsiyi: vybrani pratsi: statti, analitychni ohlyady, pereklady (2003–2010) [Philosophy of law: interests of the enterprise: vibrations of hands: stats, analogous views, bars (2003–2010)]. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Slobodnyuk, S.L. (2011). Pravovaya realnost: istoricheskiy analiz [Legal reality: historical analysis]. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatelstvo PbGPU [in Russia].
Slobodnyuk, S.L. (2013). Pravovaya realnost: ponyatiye i struktura [Legal reality: the concept and structure]. Sovremennoye pravo – Contemporary Law, 2, 8-11. [in Russia].
Zahalna teoriya derzhavy i prava / za zah. red. V.V. Kopeychykova [The title of the theory of power and rights / per zag. ed. V.V. Kopeychikova] (1994). Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].
Slyvka, S.S. (2002). Filosofiya prava: Navchalnyy posibnyk [Philosophy of Law: Navchnalny Hospital]. Kyiv : Atika [in Ukrainian].
Karpichkov, V.O. (2012). Pravova realnist yak vyyav tsinnosti prava: pidkhody do kharakterystyky [Legal reality yak viyav values of rights: approach to characterization]. Almanakh prava – Almanac of Law, 2, 191–194 [in Ukrainian].
Malinova, I.P. (1995). Filosofiya prava (ot metafiziki k germenevtike). [Philosophy of law (from metaphysics to hermeneutics)]. Yekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural'skoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii [in Russia].
Vasilyev, A.M. (1976). Pravovyye kategorii: Metodologicheskiye aspekty razrabotki sistemy kategoriy teorii prava [Legal categories: Methodological aspects of developing a system of categories of law]. Moskva: Yuridicheskaya literatura [in Russia].
Spektorskiy, E. (2011). Yurysprudentsyya y fylosofyya. Filosofiya ta entsyklopediya prava v Universyteti Svyatoho Volodymyra: u 2 kn. / za red. I. S. Hrytsenka. [Jurisprudence and philosophy. Philosophy and encyclopedia of law in the University of St. Volodymyr: in 2 books. / ed. І. S. Gritsenka] (pp. 381-407). Kyiv: Lybid[in Ukrainian].
Savenko, V.V. (2014). Strukturno-funktsionalnyy analiz pravovoyi realʹnosti yak filosofsʹko–yurydychnoyi katehoriyi [Structural-functional analysis of legal reality yak philosophical – legal category]. Naukovyy visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriya: Pravo – Scientific Herald of Uzhgorod National University. Series: Right. Uzhhorod, 29 (2), 269–272 [in Ukrainian].
Kret,O.V. (2007). Pravovaya realnost: ontologo-gnoseologicheskiy analiz: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filos. nauk: 09.00.01. [Legal reality: ontological and epistemological analysis: author. dis. ... Cand. Philosophy Sciences: 09.00.01]. Tambov [in Russia].
