The legal regime of artificial intelligence in civil law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2019.04.091Keywords:
artificial intelligence, civil rights subject, civil rights object, electronic person, legal regimeAbstract
The aim of the chosen topic. Obviously, stopping the development of artificial intelligence is difficult or almost impossible. Since artificial intelligence technologies are actively affecting virtually every aspect of human life, there is an objective need for a thorough study of the artificial intelligence legal regime. Such research is related to the need to ensure the development of socially oriented technologies that will meet the interests of human security, the preservation of their personal space, will and consciousness.
The purpose of this research is to analyze the legal side of this issue in order to ensure the proper legal regime for the use of artificial intelligence.
The main results of the research. The features of determining the place of artificial intelligence in civil law have been investigated. The question of the recognition possibility of artificial intelligence and the robot as the object or subject of civil rights (legal relations) is considered and the possible risks are analyzed. The author stands for the inappropriateness of understanding artificial intelligence as a civil rights subject. It is more appropriate to understand artificial intelligence as a civil rights object. In addition, when applying artificial intelligence technologies in areas such as medicine or public administration, it is advisable to extend the legal regime of the source of increased risk to this civil rights object, in order to better protect the rights of artificial intelligence technologies users.
References
Ethically Aligned Design. The IEEE Standards Association. 13 Dec. 2016. URL: https://standards.ieee.org/develop/indconn/ec/ead_v1.pdf [in English].
Radutnyi, O. E. Prohnozno-pravovyi pohliad na shtuchnyi intelekt ta tsyfrovu liudynu [Predictive legal perspective on artificial intelligence and digital man]. URL: https://ivpz.kh.ua/uk/%D1%87%D0%B8-%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%96-%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F-%D1%88%D1%82%D1%83%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE-%D1%96%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82/ [in Ukrainian].
Baranov, O.A. (2017). Internet Rechei i shtuchnyi intelekt: vytoky pravovoho rehuliuvannia [The Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence: The Origins of Legal Regulation]. IT-pravo: problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku v Ukraini: zbirnyk materialiv II-yi Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii - (Lviv, 17 lystopada 2017 r.) – IT Law: Challenges and Prospects for Development in Ukraine. Proceedings of the Second International Scientific and Practical Conference (Lviv, November 17, 2017). Lviv: NU «Lvivska politekhnika», 18-42 [in Ukrainian].
Baranov, O.A. (2018). Internet rechei (IoT): robot zi shtuchnym intelektom u pravovidnosynakh [Internet of Things (IoT): a robot with artificial intelligence in legal relationships.]. Yurydychna Ukraina – Legal Ukraine, 5-6, 75-95 [in Ukrainian].
Principles for designers, builders and users of robots. URL: https://epsrc.ukri.org/research/ourportfolio/themes/engineering/activities/principlesofrobotics/ [in English].
Bodena, M., Brysonb, J., Caldwellc, D., Dautenhahnd K., Edwardse L., Kemberf S., Newmang, P., Parryh V., Pegmani G., Roddenj, T., Sorrellk T., Wallisl M., Whitbya, B., Winfield, A. (2017). Principles of robotics: regulating robots in the real world. Connection Science. 29(2), 124-129. Retrieved from http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/30566/1/Principles%20of%20robotics%20regulating%20robots%20in%20the%20real%20world.pdf [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2016.1271400
European Parliament resolution of 12 February 2019 on a comprehensive European industrial policy on artificial intelligence and robotics (2018/2088(INI)). Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ TA-8-2019-0081_EN.html [in English].
Kosse, D. D. (2009). Pravovyi rezhym ta mekhanizm pravovoho rehuliuvannia: oznaky ta spivvidnoshennia [Legal regime and mechanism of legal regulation: signs and correlation]. Derzhava i pravo – State and Law, 44, 25-31 [in Ukrainian].
Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy – Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2003, №№ 40-44. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15 [in Ukrainian].
Floridi, L. (2016). On Human Dignity as a Foundation for the Right to Privacy. Philosophy & Technology, 308. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/ pdf/10.1007%2Fs13347-016-0220-8.pdf [in English].
Nadon, V. V. (2014). Deiaki aspekty vyznachennia pravozdatnosti v tsyvilnomu pravi [Some aspects of the determination of legal capacity in civil law]. Teoriia i praktyka pravoznavstva – Theory and Practice of Law, 1 (5). Retrieved from http://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/16361/1/5.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Volkova, N.V. (2015). Shchodo vyznachennia pidstav obmezhennia tsyvilnoi diiezdatnosti fizychnoi osoby pry rozghliadi sprav u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi [Regarding the determination of the grounds for limiting the civil capacity of an individual when considering cases in civil proceedings]. Chasopys tsyvilistyky – Journal of Civil Studies, 18, 91-94. Retrieved from http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/11300/8314/Chasopys%2091-94.pdf.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [in Ukrainian].
Hrynko, S. D. (2015). Deliktozdatnist nepovnolitnikh fizychnykh osib za tsyvilnym zakonodavstvom Ukrainy ta zarubizhnykh krain: porivnialno-pravovyi analiz. Chasopys tsyvilistyky, 19, 158-165. Retrieved from http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/11300/8517/33.pdf.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [in Ukrainian].
Prylutskyi, R. B. (2013). Osnovni teorii yurydychnoi osoby ta yikh vplyv na rozvytok orhanizatsiinykh form subiektiv hospodariuvannia [Basic theories of a legal entity and their influence on the development of organizational forms of economic entities]. Yurydychna nauka – Legal Science, 3, 35-49. Retrieved from http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN= LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=jnn_2013_3_6 [in Ukrainian].
Spektor, O. M. (2015). Tvaryna yak osoblyvyi obiekt rechovykh prav [Animal as a special object of property rights.]. Prykarpatskyi yurydychnyi visnyk - Carpathian Legal Bulletin, 3(9), 70-76. Retrieved from http://www.pjv.nuoua.od.ua/v3_2015/15.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Karl Lagerfeld’s cat Choupette could inherit part of his fortune. Retrieved from https://www.marketwatch.com/story/karl-lagerfelds-cat-choupette-could-inherit-part-of-his-fortune-2019-02-20 [in English].
Richard, A. (2002). Epstein Animals as Objects, or Subjects, of Rights U Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper, 171, 35 2002. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=359240&download=yes https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1052&context=law_and_economics [in English].
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.html [in English].
Javier Andreu Perez, Fani Deligianni, Daniele Ravi, Guang-Zhong Yang Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. Retrieved from https://www.ukras.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/UK_RAS_wp_AI_web.pdf [in English].
Calo R., (2014). Robotics and the Lessons of Cyberlaw [Robotics and the Lessons of Cyberlaw]. California Law Review. Lega Studies Research Paper - . No. 2014. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=4284&context=californialawreview [in English].
