Expansion and enrichment of the semantic field of law as a way to create a legal society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2020.02.005Keywords:
legal thinking, legal meanings, legal reality, law-governed state, values, legal cultureAbstract
This article is devoted to the problem of formation of modern legal thinking, "meaningful thinking" in law, because it is thanks to such thinking that legal meanings are formed and real legal life becomes possible, legal reality is enriched and expanded. However, the reform of the intellectual component of legal reality in Ukraine is very slow, the semantic field of law is not only not enriched, but rather narrowed, which means that much of the social interaction can be removed and is already beyond the influence of law. This work is designed to show the need to expand and enrich the field of legal meanings in legal development, the role of meaningful legal thinking in the creation of legal reality. The article proves that in the context of the current legal development it is necessary to form a holistic integrative legal thinking, because it is in its bosom possible search and creation of legal meanings and their centers, around which the humanistic worldview is built. This is necessary for the modern Ukrainian state.References
Bachynyn, V.A. (1998). Fylosofyya prava y prestuplenyya [Philosophy of law and crime]. Kharkov: Folyo [in Russian].
Bratasyuk, V.M. (2005). Pravo yak forma proyavu intelektualnoyi tradytsiyi epokhy (na materialakh romano-hermanskoyi pravovoyi simyi) [Law as a form of manifestation of the intellectual tradition of the era (based on the materials of the Romano-Germanic legal family)]. Avtoref. dys. ... k.yu.n.: 12.00.12 – filosofiya prava. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Malyshev, B.V. (2004). Pravovyy pretsedent: stylʹ yurydychnoho myslennya [Legal precedent: style of legal thinking]. Problemy filosofiyi prava – Problems of Philosophy of Law. T.2. [in Ukrainian].
Kara-Murza, S. H. (2000). Manypulyatsyya soznanyem [Manipulation of consciousness]. Kyiv [in Russian].
Selivanov, V.M. (2002). Pravo i vlada v suchasniy Ukrayini: metodolohichni aspekty [Law and power in modern Ukraine: methodological aspects]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Tokarska, A. (2010). Pravova realnist i pravova komunikatsiya u konteksti krytychnoho dyskurs-analizu [Legal reality and legal communication in the context of critical discourse analysis]. Ekonomiko-pravovyy chasopys - economic and legal journal, 1 [in Ukrainian].
Tykhomyrov, O. (2010). Filosofski ta metodolohichni aspekty komparatyvnoho pidkhodu do pravo rozuminnya [Philosophical and methodological aspects of a comparative approach to the law of understanding]. Pravo Ukrayiny – Law of Ukraine, 4 [in Ukrainian].
Trebin, M. P. (2008). Pravosvidomist hromadyan Ukrayiny: stan ta vydy deformatsiyi [Legal awareness of citizens of Ukraine: state and types of deformation]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. V. N Karazina – Bulletin of Kharkiv National University. І.М. Karazina, 12 [in Ukrainian].
Saparova, A.O. (2015). Zapozychennya v pravi: filosofsko-metodolohichni zasady. [Borrowing in law: philosophical and methodological principles]. Dys. …k.yu.n. : 12.00.12 – filosofiya prava. Lviv [in Ukrainian].
Saparova, A. (2013). Problemy i perspektyvy osmyslennya kontseptu «pravovykh transplantantiv» na tli tradytsiyi yurydychnoho pozytyvizmu [Problems and prospects of understanding the concept of "legal transplants" against the background of the tradition of legal positivism]. Porivnyalne pravoznavstvo – Comparative Law, 1–2 [in Ukrainian].
Ovchynnykov, A. Y. (2003). Pravovoe myshlenye: teoretyko-metodolohycheskyy analyz.[ Legal thinking: theoretical and methodological analysis]. Rostov N/D. [in Russian].
Mykhaylov, A. M. (2012). Henezys kontynentalʹnoy yurydycheskoy dohmatyky : monohrafyya [Genesis of continental legal dogmatics: monograph]. Moskva: Yurlytynform [in Russian].
Mushynskyy, V.S. (1992). Sumerky totalytarnoho soznanyya. [Twilight of totalitarian consciousness]. Hosudarstvo i parvo – State and Law, 3 [in Russian].
Whitman, J. Q. (2008). Western legal imperialism: thinking about the deep historical roots. Theoretical inquires in law, 10 (2) [in English]. https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1218
Monateri, P. G. Black Gaius (1999). A guest for the multicultural origins of the «Western legal tradition». Hastings law journal, 50. April [in English].
Kjaer, A. N. (2004). A common legal language in Europe? Epistemology and methodology of Comparative law / ed. by M. V. Hoecke. Portland: Hart Publishing [in English].
Bratasyuk, M.H. (2017). «Osmyslyuyuche myslennya» (M.Haydeher) v pravoviy sferi yak chynnyk porozuminnya v suchasniy Ukrayini Dialoh i porozuminnya dlya yevropeyskoyi ta svitovoyi spilnot (Iz zaluchennyam tvorchoho dosvidu Lvivsko-Varshavskoyi shkoly). ["Meaningful thinking" (M. Heidegger) in the legal field as a factor of understanding in modern Ukraine Dialogue and understanding for the European and world communities (With the involvement of creative experience of the Lviv-Warsaw school)]. Kolektyvna monohrafiya. Za zah. red. prof. A.Karasya. Lviv [in Ukrainian].
Khaydehher, M. (1991). Chto znachyt myslyt? Razhovor na proselochnoy dorohe. [What does it mean to think? Conversation on a country road]. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola [in Russian].
Nesterenko, V. (1995) Vstup do filosofiyi: ontolohiya lyudyny. [Introduction to philosophy: the ontology of human]. Kyyiv: Abrys. [in Ukrainian].
Morozov, A.YU. (2004). Filosofsko-etychnyy analiz fenomenu smerti v konteksti problemy sensu zhyttya. [Philosophical and ethical analysis of the phenomenon of death in the context of the problem of the meaning of life]. Multyversum. Filosofskyy alʹmanakh. Kyiv: Tsentr dukhovnoyi kultury [in Ukrainian].
Bratasyuk, M.H. (2005). Znachennya pohlyadiv YE.Erlikha na osoblyvosti yurydychnoho myslennya v konteksti pravovoyi kultury postmodern. [The value of E. Ehrlich's views on the features of legal thinking in the context of the legal culture of postmodernism]. Problemy filosofiyi prava – Problems of Philosophy of Law, 3 (1-2) [in Ukrainian].
Prychepiy, Ye.M., Chekal, A.M. ta in. (2001). Filosofiya [Philosophy]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Erlich, E. (1903). Freie Rechtsfindung und freie Rechswissenschaft. Leipzig [in German].
