General characteristics and features of administrative coercive measures in penal institutions

Authors

  • Stanislav Zlyvko Academy of the State Penitentiary Service
  • Maksym Sykal Academy of the State Penitentiary Service

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/app2020.03.053

Keywords:

administrative coercive, penal institutions, the staff of the State Criminal and Executive Service of Ukraine, administrative activities, the State Criminal and Executive Service of Ukraine

Abstract

The urgency of considering the application of administrative coercive measures by the staff of the State Criminal and Executive Service of Ukraine is due, on the one hand, to the insufficient theoretical elaboration of this issue, on the other hand to the increasing need of penal institutions in scientific developments aimed at solving specific practical problems.The purpose of the article is to determine and characterize administrative coercion measures in penal institutions on the basis of the analysis of scientific developments and normative-legal acts.Administrative coercion measures in penal institutions are defined and characterized in the article on the basis of the analysis of scientific developments and normative-legal acts. Types of administrative coercion measures, in particular, administrative termination, measures of administrative prevention, measures of administrative termination and measures of administrative responsibility were investigated. The definition of administrative coercive measures applied by the staff of penal institutions was formulated. Namely, it is defined as a set of legally established methods and means used in order to stop illegal behavior of a person violating the law in the field of penal institutions activities, with further involvement of perpetrators to legal liability.Traditionally, administrative coercive measures are divided into preventive measures, coercive measures and liability measures. However, there are other approaches for distributing the administrative coercion measures in the scientific literature. These are measures of administrative termination, measures of administrative prevention, measures of administrative termination and measures of administrative responsibility.It is pointed out that administrative coercion measures make a holistic system in the activities of penal institutions. It includes measures of prevention, termination and responsibility. The main peculiarities of administrative coercion measures in penal institutions are the following: firstly, the subject structure: bodies of the State Criminal and Executive Service of Ukraine (central executive body for executing sentences; territorial governing bodies of the central executive body for executing sentences); penal institutions; other units (paramilitary formations of the State Criminal and Executive Service of Ukraine; bodies of the National Police); secondly, the peculiarities of administrative coercion measures in the activities of the State Criminal and Executive Service of Ukraine include the procedure of application, which combines administrative coercion and criminal-executive activities; thirdly, the application of administrative coercion measures is aimed at ensuring the regime of serving a sentence; fourthly, the use of special means and weapons, as well as the application of various penalties due to the law enforcement nature of a penal institution.

References

Puzyrnyi, V.F. (2016). Poniattia administratyvnoho prymusu v diialnosti ustanov vykonannia pokaran [The concept of administrative coercion in the activities of penitentiary institutions]. Forum prava – Law Forum, 4, 271-276. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/FP_index.htm_2016_4_44.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Romanova, M.V. (Eds.). (2015). Problemy zabezpechennia prav zasudzhenykh u penitentsiarnii systemi Ukrainy [Problems of ensuring the rights of convicts in the penitentiary system of Ukraine]. Kharkiv: Kharkiv Human Rights Group. Human Rights [in Ukrainian].

Elahyn, A. H., & Melnykova, N. A. (2013). Administrativnaia deiatelnost ispravytelnykh uchrezhdenii [Administrative activities of correctional institutions]. Vologda: VIPE FSIN [in Russian].

Hrechaniuk, S.K. Klasyfikatsiia zakhodiv administratyvnoho prymusu v diialnosti orhaniv ta ustanov Derzhavnoi kryminalno-vykonavchoi sluzhby Ukrainy [Classification of measures of administrative coercion in the activities of bodies and institutions of the State Penitentiary Service of Ukraine]. Retrieved from http://www.lex-line.com.ua/?language=ruHYPERLINK%20 [in Ukrainian].

Kryminalnyy kodeks Ukrayiny: pryiniatyi 5 kvitnya 2001 roku № 2341-III [Criminal Code of Ukraine from April 5, 2001 № 2341-III]. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14 [in Ukrainian].

Kryminalno-vykonavchyy kodeks Ukrayiny: pryiniatyi 11 lypnya 2003 roku №1129-IV [Criminal-Executive Code of Ukraine from July 11, 2003 № 1129-IV]. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1129-15 [in Ukrainian].

Kryminalnyy protsesualnyy kodeks Ukrayiny : pryiniatyi 13 kvitnya 2012 roku № 4651-VI [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine from April 13, 2012 № 4651-VI]. Retrieved from zakon.rada.gov.ua/go/4651-17 [in Ukrainian].

Pro poperednye uvyaznennya: pryiniatyi 30 chervnya 1993 roku № 3352-XII [The Law of Ukraine «On pre-trial detention» from June 30, 1993 № 3352-XII] Retrieved from http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3352-12 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2020-12-19

Issue

Section

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCESS. FINANCE LAW. INFORMATION LAW. INTERNATIONAL LAW

How to Cite

Zlyvko, Stanislav, and Maksym Sykal. “General Characteristics and Features of Administrative Coercive Measures in Penal Institutions”. Actual Problems of Law, vol. 1, no. 3, Dec. 2020, pp. 53-58, https://doi.org/10.35774/app2020.03.053.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 822

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.