Is freedom of expression in danger in the light of the CJEU decisions on the cases C-507-17 google v. CNIL and C-18/18 EVA Glawischnig- Piesczek v. Facebook?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2021.02.097Keywords:
Freedom of expression, human rights, Google Case, Facebook Case, EU LawAbstract
Last year in September and November, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rendered two important judgements on landmark cases C-507/17 Google v. Commission nationale de L’informatique et des libertes (CNIL) (24 September 2019) and C-18/18 Eva Glawischnig- Piesczek v. Facebook Ireland Limited (G-P v. Facebook) (3 October 2019). At first sight, these cases do not directly related to those fundamental rights as they are more about personal, material and territorial limits on the scope of right to be forgotten (Google v. CNIL) or an injunction (G-P v. Facebook). However they, especially the second judgement, will have serious effect on freedom of expression and access to information. In Google v. CNIL, the CJEU ruled that French national data protection authority’s order demanding that Google remove certain offending search results worldwide was impermissible. On the other hand, in G-P v. Facebook, the Court held that Article 15 of the EU’s e-commerce directive does not prohibit EU Member States from ordering extremely broad injunctions against platforms like Facebook to take down offending material (and therefore allows it). The court held that these injunctions can cover a wide array of material-not just Facebook posts but also reposts and “equivalent” posts- and apply worldwide.
In this study, the limits to the freedom of expression and access to information shall be analysed under the case law of the ECtHR and CJEU with specific evaluation as the possible consequences of Google and Facebook judgements rendered by the CJEU.
References
Akdeniz, Y., Altıparmak, K. (2018). Turkey: Freedom of Expression in Jeopardy: Violations of the rights of authors, publishers and academics under the State of Emergency. Retrieved from https://www.englishpen.org/posts/campaigns/turkey-freedom-of-expression-in-jeopardy/ Last accessed: 07.09.2020.
Barendt, E. (2005), Freedom of Speech. Oxford University Press.
Bresic, D. (2019). Google vs. CNIL: The CJEU determines the territorial scope of the right to de-referencing. Retrieved from https://www.law.kuleuven.be/citip/blog/google-vs-cnil-the-cjeu-determines-the-territorial-scope-of-the-right-to-de-referencing/ Last accessed: 15.01.2020.
Bychawska-Siniarska, D. (2017). Protecting the Right to Freedom of Expression under the European Convention on Human Rights. A handbook for legal practitioners, Council of Europe: 63-68.
Carlsson, U. (2016). Freedom of expression in the digital transition- Speech at the European Symposium on Media Policy 2015, Oslo 20 November 2015. Journal of Media Business Studies, 13/3: 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2016.1192322
Daskal, J. (2019). А European Court Decision May Usher in Global. Retrieved from https: //slate.com/technology/2019/10/european-court-justice-glawischnig-piesczek-facebook-censorship.htm. Last accessed: 20.01.2020.
Dunphy-Moriel, M., Ditted, A. (2019). Platforms told by CJEU: Do delete the derogatory remarks…If you’re asked to. Retrieved from https://www.kemplittle.com/blog/platforms-cjeu-delete-the-derogatory-remarks/> Last accessed: 14.01.2020.
Frantziou, E. (2019). The Horizontal Effect of Fundamental Rights in the European Union- A Constitutional Analysis, Oxford Studies in European Law.
Human Rights Files No.18, Freedom of Expression in Europe, Case-law concerning Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Council of Europe, March 2017.
Knol-Radoja, K. (2020). Freedom of Expression on the Internet- Case 18/18 Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Limited. Balkan Social Science Review, 15, 7-24. https://doi.org/10.46763/BSSR2015007kr
Lavranos, N. (2008). Towards a Solagne-Method Between International Courts and Tribunals’ in Broude, T. and Shany, Y. (eds). The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity, Hart Publishing.
McGonagle, T. (2012). The Council of Europe against hate speech: Conundrums and challanges. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/16800c170f. Last accessed: 19.03.2020.
Samonte, M. (2019). Google v CNIL Case C-507/17: The Territorial Scope of the Right to be Forgotten under EU Law. Retrieved from https://europeanlawblog.eu/2019/10/29/google-v-cnil-case-c-507-17-the-territorial-scope-of-the-right-to-be-forgotten-under-eu-law/ Last accessed: 20.01.2020.
Shapiro, T. (2019). CJEU Facebook judgement says member states can order platforms to remove defamatory material globally. Retrieved from https://www.wiggin.co.uk/insight/cjeu-facebook-judgment-says-member-states-can-order-platforms-to-remove-defamatory-material-globally/ Last accessed: 15.01.2020.
Silver, I., Pepper, C. (2019). Monitoring online content: the impact of Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Limited. Retrieved from https://www.reedsmith.com/en/perspectives/2019/11/monitoring-online-content-the-impact-of-eva-glawischnig-piesczek-v-facebook. Last accessed: 20.01.2020.
Taylor, M. (2017). Google Spain Revisited: The Misunderstood Implementation of a Landmark Decision and How Public International Law Could Offer Guidance. European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), 2, pp.195-208. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2017/2/9
Tambou, O. (2019). Lessons from the First Post-GDPR Fines of CNIL against Google LLC. European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), 1, pp.80-84. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2019/1/13
Topidi, K. (2019). Words That Hurt [1]: Normative and Institutional Considerations in the Regulation of Hate Speech in Europe. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3488707. Last accessed: 01.03.2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3488707
Tulkens, F. (2012). What to say is to do- Freedom of expression and hate speech in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights’ Euroepean Judicial Training Network. European Court of Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.ejtn.eu/Documents/About%20EJTN/INdependent%20Seminars/TULKENS_FRANCOISE_Presentation_When_to_Say_is_To_Do_Freedom_of_Expression_and_Hate_Speech_in_the_Case_Law_of_the_ECtHR_October_2012.pdf> Last accesed: 14.03.2020.
Wong, S., Murray, E. (2019). Retrieved from https://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/google-v-cnil-eu-rules-that-right-to-be-forgotten-does-not-apply-globally. Last accessed: 17.01.2020.
