Abroad experience of electronic jurisdiction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2023.01.194Keywords:
PACER, Case Management/Electronic Case Files, National Model Practice Direction For the Use of Technology in Civil Litigation, e-filing system, eLodgment, Internet Courts in ChinaAbstract
The paper aims to explain the trends and problems of electronic justice development abroad. Within the research, the tasks include an analysis of the regulatory documents and organizational features of the implementation the certain measures of court digitalization.
The main scientific method used in the article's architecture is deductive. In the conditions of the study, a gradual transition is made from the general trends of electronic justice to their features in different countries.
The structure of the article is formed in accordance with theoretical and analytical tasks. It also reflects the use of certain methods of scientific research and scientific materials.
The theoretical method is used during the study of the regulatory documents and problems of electronic justice implementation abroad. The materials used for the method application include legislative acts, regulations, strategy and scientific literature.
In the article, it is analyzed the development and implementation of the electronic justice system in the USA and the use of the PACER and Case Management/Electronic Case Files System (CM/ECF). The National Model Practice Direction For the Use of Technology in Civil Litigation in Canada is studied. The experience of implementing electronic justice in Poland, Australia and China is described.
References
Speedy Trial Act. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-628-speedy-trial-act-1974 [in English]
Owen Forrester, J. (1995). History of the Federal Judiciary's Automation Program, The L. Ralph Mecham & Federal Courts Administration: A Decade of Innovation and Progress. American University Law Review. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=aulr [in English]
Judiciary information technology fund. Retrieved from https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/fy_2020_jitf_0.pdf [in English]
Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER). Retrieved from https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ [in English]
Martin Peter W. (2008). Online Access to Court Records - From Documents to Data, Particulars to Patterns. Cornell Law Faculty Publications, 93, 855-888. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article= 1092&context=lsrp_papers [in English] https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1107412
Kliutsevskyi, V. (2020). Elektronne sudochynstvo: shliakhy vprovadzhennia ta zarubizhnyi dosvid [Electronic justice: ways of implementation and foreign experience]. Teoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia i mistsevoho samovriaduvannia - Theory and practice of state administration and local self-government, 1. Retrieved from http://el-zbirn-du.at.ua/2020_1/16.pdf [in Ukrainian].
PACER Pricing: How fees work. Retrieved from https://pacer.uscourts.gov/pacer-pricing-how-fees-work [in English]
Zaplotynskyi B.A. (2018). Elektronne sudochynstvo : konspekt lektsii. Kafedra menedzhmentu ta informatsiinykh tekhnolohii KIIVtaP NU «OIuA» [Electronic justice: a summary of lectures. Department of Management and Information Technologies of KIIVtaP NU “OYUA”] [in Ukrainian].
Goggin Kayla. Bill Would Make Online Access to Federal Court Records Free (February 13, 2019). Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20190213220527/https://www.courthousenews.com/bill-would-make-online-access-to-federal-court-records-free/ [in English]
E-Government Act of 2002. Retrieved from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-107publ347/pdf/PLAW-107publ347.pdf [in English]
Electronic Filing (CM/ECF). US Supreme Court. Retrieved from https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/electronic-filing-cmecf
Trut, D. Advantages of electronic justice. We keep up with the times. Retrieved from https://uz.ligazakon.ua/ua/magazine_article/EA009834 [in Ukrainian].
Holubieva N. Yu. (2020). Elektronne sudochynstvo: mizhnarodnyi dosvid : monohrafiia [Electronic justice: international experience: monograph]. Retrieved from http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/14039 [in Ukrainian].
What is a Notice of Docket Activity? Retrieved from https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/faq/what-notice-docket-activity [in English]
Nesterchuk, L. P. & Bidenko, O. V. (2018) Systema federalnykh sudiv SShA ta efektyvnist zdiisnennia pravosuddia [The US federal court system and the effectiveness of the administration of justice]. Aktualni problemy polityky - Actual problems of politics, 62, 138-151 [in Ukrainian].
CM/ECF attorney manual (december 2022). Retrieved from https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/docs/pdfs/cmecfatyusermanual.pdf [in English]
How to get started building a new CM/ECF. Today. Retrieved from https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/18f_experiment_and_iterate_supplemental_report_2022_0.pdf [in English]
Huang, W., Yi, T., Zhu, H., Shang, W., & Lin, W. (2021). Improved privacy preserving method for periodical SRS publishing. PLoS ONE, 16(4). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250457 [in Chinese]
Zozulia D.D. (2014). Problemy vprovadzhennia elektronnoho dokumentoobihu v sudovii systemi Ukrainy [Problems of implementing electronic document management in the judicial system of Ukraine]. Kultura ta informatsiine suspilstvo – Culture and information society, 239-240 [in Ukrainian]
Zaikin A.P. (2021). Dihitalizatsiia sudovoi vlady: teoretyko-pravovyi aspekt [Digitization of the judiciary: theoretical and legal aspect]. Candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv : Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav [in Ukrainian]
Can LII. Retrieved from https://www.canlii.org/en/ [in English]
Guidelines for the Use of Technology in any Civil Litigation Matter. Retrieved from https://cjc-ccm.ca/cmslib/general/JTAC%20National%20Model%20 Practic(1).pdf [in English]
Obrusna, S. (2010). Zarubizhnyi dosvid sudovoho upravlinnia ta mozhlyvosti yoho vykorystannia pry reformuvanni sudovoi systemy Ukrainy [Foreign experience of judicial administration and possibilities of its use in reforming the judicial system of Ukraine]. Visnyk Vyshchoi rady yustytsii - Bulletin of the High Council of Justice, 4, 52–71 [in Ukrainian]
Dubenko, O. M. (2022). Zakordonnyi dosvid ta napriamy vdoskonalennia administratyvno-pravovoho zabezpechennia administratyvnoho sudochynstva [Foreign experience and directions for improvement of administrative and legal support of administrative proceedings]. Pivdennoukrainskyi pravnychyi chasopys - South Ukrainian legal journal, 3, 133-139 [in Ukrainian]
Kachuriner, V. L. & Pakhlevanzade, A. (2022). Analiz yevropeiskoho dosvidu ta yevropeiskykh standartiv shchodo orhanizatsii sudovoi vlady v Ukraini [Analysis of European experience and European standards regarding the organization of the judiciary in Ukraine]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal - Legal scientific electronic journal, 9, 558-561 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2022-9/137
Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Wersja od: 15 kwietnia 2023 r. do: 21 maja 2023 r. Retrieved from https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/dzu-dziennik-ustaw/kodeks-postepowania-cywilnego-16786199 [in Poland]
Yizhak, O. Stvorennia efektyvnoi sudovoi systemy: dosvid Polshchi [Creating an effective judicial system: the experience of Poland]. Retrieved from http://jurliga.ligazakon.ua/news/2013/8/6/95832.htm [in Ukrainian].
Elektroniczne Postępowanie Upominawcze. Retrieved from https://www.e-sad.gov.pl/ [in Poland]
Land and Environment Court. Retrieved from https://leap.unep.org/node/49 [in English]
Federal court of Australia. Retrieved from https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/online-services [in English]
E-court Australia. Retrieved from https://www.ecourtroom.fedcourt.gov.au/ ecourtroom/default.aspx [in English]
Interpretation of PBOC's 2022 financial statistics system. Retrieved from https://riking.net/en/xwzx/info.aspx?itemid=10652&page=1 [in English]
Chinese court system: internet courts. Retrieved from https://www.lexology.com/commentary/litigation/china/global-law-office/chinese-court-system-internet-courts [in Chinese]
Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Cases by Internet Courts. Retrieved from https://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-116981.html [in Chinese]
Bezhevets, A. M. (2020). Elektronne sudochynstvo yak neobkhidnyi element tsyfrovoi transformatsii suspilstva ta derzhavy [Electronic justice as a necessary element of the digital transformation of society and the state]. Informatsiia i pravo - Information and law, 4(35), 142-146 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.37750/2616-6798.2020.4(35).221244
Pro nadilennia povnovazhenniamy Verkhovnoho narodnoho sudu za eksperymentalnymy reform shchodo sproshchennia ta dyversyfikatsii protsesu tsyvilnoho sudochynstva: Rishennia PK VZNP vid 28.12.2019 r. № 42 [On granting the powers of the Supreme People’s Court under experimental reforms to simplify and diversify the process of civil justice: Decision of the Supreme People's Court of Ukraine dated 28.12.2019 No. 42]. Retrieved from http://www.lawinfochina.com/display.aspx?id=32123&lib=law [in Ukrainian] https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.5807
Supreme Court Releases White Paper “Internet Judiciary in Chinese Courts”. Retrieved from https://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-205421.html [in Chinese]
