Failure of the defendant to appear at the court as a ground for postponement of criminal proceedings: Problem aspects in practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2023.01.215Keywords:
court proceedings, non-appearance of the defense attorney at the court session, criminal proceedings, postponement of court proceedings in criminal proceedingsAbstract
The non-arrival of the defense attorney during the trial is one of the main grounds for postponement of the trial in criminal proceedings. The analysis of judicial practice made it possible to conclude that the absence of a defense attorney at a court hearing, if participation is mandatory, is also a fairly common reason for annulment of decisions and sentences of the court of first instance with the appointment of a new trial in connection with the violation of the requirements of the criminal procedural law. At the same time, it is known that the non-appearance of a party to a criminal proceeding does not prevent the proceedings only if the person was properly notified of the date, time and place of the trial and did not provide valid reasons for his non-appearance.In view of this, the question of classifying the reasons for the defense attorney's non-appearance as legitimate remains a difficult one. Criminal procedural legislation leaves the resolution of the specified issue entirely to the discretion of the court. The exception is Art. 138 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, which establishes a list of valid reasons for a person's non-arrival at a summons, but this list is not exhaustive. In addition, the Bar Council of Ukraine adopted a decision regarding the validity of the reasons for the absence of lawyers to participate in court hearings during the consideration of cases, investigative actions and other jurisdictional procedures under martial law. Therefore, it is important for an in-depth study of the non-appearance of a defense attorney at a court session to conduct an analysis of court practice in Ukraine.References
Konventsiya Rady Yevropy pro zakhyst prav lyudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod vid 04.11.1950 (redaktsiya vid 02.10.2013 r.) [Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua. [in Ukrainian]
Postanova kolehiyi suddiv Druhoyi sudovoyi palaty Kasatsiynoho kryminalʹnoho sudu Verkhovnoho sudu Ukrayiny vid 27 serpnya 2020 r. Sprava № 199/330/18. Provadzhennya № 51-1647/km/20. Yedynyy derzhavnyy reyestr sudovykh rishenʹ (court.gov.ua) [Resolution of the panel of judges of the Second Judicial]. Unified State Register of Court Decisions (court.gov.ua)]. [in Ukrainian]
Rishennya Kvalifikatsiyno-dystsyplinarnoyi komisiyi advokatury Kyyivsʹkoyi oblasti vid 01 lypnya 2021 r. VII-015/2021 [Decision of the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Kyiv Oblast]. Retrieved from http: https://vkdka.org/rishennya-vii-0152021-za-skargoyu-na-rishennya-distsiplinarnoji-palati-kvalifikatsijno-distsiplinarnoji-komisiji-advokaturi-kijivskoji-oblasti-642021-vid-31-03-2021-roku-pro-zakrittya-distsiplin/ [in Ukrainian]
Rishennya Kvalifikatsiyno-dystsyplinarnoyi komisiyi advokatury Kyyivsʹkoyi oblasti vid 30 lystopada 2021 r. XI-005/2021. [Decision of the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission]. Retrieved from http:https://vkdka.org/rishennya-vii-0152021-za-skargoyu-na-rishennya-distsiplinarnoji-palati- qualificatsijno-distsiplinarnoji-komisiji-advokaturi-kijivskoji-oblasti-642021-vid-31-03-2021-roku-pro-zakrittya-distsiplin. [in Ukrainian]
Rishennya Natsionalʹnoyi asotsiatsiyi advokativ Ukrayiny «Pro povazhnistʹ prychyn neyavky advokata v sudove zasidannya, slidchi diyi toshcho pid chas voyennoho stanu» vid 16-17.11.2022 r. №14 [Decision of the National Association of Lawyers of Ukraine "On the validity of the reasons for a lawyer's failure to appear at a court session, investigative actions, etc. during martial law"]. Retrieved from http: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua. [in Ukrainian]
Senyk, T. B. (2018). Neprybuttya zakhysnyka v sudove zasidannya yak pidstava dlya vidkladennya roz•hlyadu kryminalʹnoho provadzhennya: problemni aspekty. Ukrayina v umovakh reformuvannya pravovoyi systemy: suchasni realiyi ta mizhnarodnyy dosvid. Materialy III Mizhnarodnoyi naukovoyi-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi. (m. Ternopilʹ, 20-21 kvitnya 2018 r.). [Non-arrival of the defense attorney at the court session as a reason for postponement of criminal proceedings: problematic aspects. Ukraine in the context of reforming the legal system: modern realities and international experience. Materials of the 3rd International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Ternopil: Economic Opinion, 134-136 [in Ukrainian]
Senyk, T. B. (2020). Suchasni realiyi vidkladennya sudovoho roz•hlyadu u kryminalʹnomu provadzhenni. [Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific and Practical Conference «Challenges in Science of Nowadays» Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific and Practical Conference "Challenges in Science of Nowadays" (USA, Washington, April 6-8, 2020)]. EnDeavours Publisher, 210-214 [in Ukrainian]
Ukhvala Sykhivsʹkoho rayonnoho sudu m. Lvova vid 07 lystopada 2019 roku, sprava № 464/50/16-k [Resolution of the Sykhiv District Court of Lviv]. Retrieved from http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/85539588 [in Ukrainian]
Ukhvala Truskavetskoho miskoho sudu Lvivskoyi oblasti vid 25 veresnya 2019 roku, sprava № 457/1083/16-k [Ruling of Truskavetsky City Court of Lviv]. Retrieved from http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/84605465 [in Ukrainian]
Ukhvala Halytsʹkoho rayonnoho sudu m. Lvova vid 15 travnya 2022 r. Sprava № 461/10304/21. Provadzhennya № 1-kp/461/288/22 [Resolution of the Halytsky District Court of Lviv]. Retrieved from http: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104267038. [in Ukrainian]
