Reporting note as a type of prosecutorial response in section of the functions of the prosecutor's bodies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/app2024.02.085

Keywords:

bodies of the prosecutor's office, functions of the prosecutor's office, report note, response act, public indictment

Abstract

This article is devoted to the review and analysis of the functions of the prosecutor's office, and also to the study of such a document as a report prepared upon consideration of certain issues by the prosecutor's office in the course of exercising its functions. The author analyses the peculiarities of the prosecutor's office activity, which, along with exercising law enforcement functions, also exercises the function of control over other law enforcement agencies, in particular, through procedural guidance in criminal proceedings. The author examines the issue of correlation between the Constitution of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine ‘On Public Prosecution’ in terms of defining the functions of the latter. In particular, the author establishes that this definition differs, since according to the Fundamental Law, the prosecutor's office performs the task of public prosecution in court, and the specialised law stipulates that it supports the public prosecution in court. The next function of the prosecutor's office defined by law is representation of the interests of the State or a citizen in court in those cases which are defined by the Law of Ukraine ‘On the Prosecutor's Office’, as well as Chapter 12 of Section III of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine (on the so-called civil forfeiture), which has some differences with its wording in the Constitution of Ukraine. The author concludes that despite a fairly detailed explanation of this function in the relevant law, as well as the inherent difference between the interests of a citizen and the State, the discrepancy between the law and the Constitution of Ukraine in defining this function remains unclear. The functions of control over the compliance of bodies conducting operational and investigative activities, inquiries, pre-trial investigations with the legislation of Ukraine, as well as supervision over the execution of court decisions in criminal cases and other coercive measures related to the restriction of personal freedom of citizens, are effectively combined into a single function. The prosecutor's office of Ukraine may issue instructions, orders and other organisational and administrative documents that create a legal mechanism for implementing joint decisions to achieve effective departmental control.

References

Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine]. (1996, June 28) Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy – Bulletin of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, № 30, pp. 141 [in Ukrainian].

Zakon Ukrainy Pro prokuraturu : pryiniatyi 14 zhovtnia 2014 roku № 1697-VII [Law of Ukraine On the Prosecutor's Office adopted on October 14, 2014, No. 1697-VII]. Retrieved from: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1697-18/print [in Ukrainian].

Shulhan I.I. (2016) Okremi aspekty pidtrymannia prokurorom publichnoho obvynuvachennia [Certain Aspects of the Prosecutor's Support of Public Prosecution]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal - Legal scientific electronic journal, 6, 238-240 [in Ukrainian].

Patiuk S. (2017) Normatyvna nevyznachenist spivvidnoshennia katehorii «derzhavne» ta «publichne» obvynuvachennia yak pidstava dlia zlovzhyvannia pravom u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Regulatory uncertainty of the correlation between the categories of “state” and “public” prosecution as a ground for abuse of law in criminal proceedings]. Ekonomiko-pravova paradyhma rozvytku suchasnoho suspilstva - Economic and legal paradigm of modern society development, 2 [in Ukrainian].

Ploskva A.V. (2023) Rozmezhuvannia poniattia pidtrymannia «publichnoho) chy «derzhavnoho» obvynuvachennia [Distinguishing between the concept of maintaining a “public” or “state” prosecution]. Yurydychnyi naukvoyi elektronnyi zhurnal Legal Science electronic journal, 7, 430-432 [in Ukrainian].

Postanova Verkhovnoho sudu vid 26 chervnia 2019 roku URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82885531 [Resolution of the Supreme Court of June 26, 2019 URL: https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82885531] [in Ukrainian].

Rekomendatsii «Koordynatsiia diialnosti pravookhoronnykh orhaniv u sferi protydii zlochynnosti». URL: https:// old.gp.gov.ua/ [Recommendations “Coordination of law enforcement agencies in the field of combating crime”. URL: https:// old.gp.gov.ua/] [in Ukrainian].

Rehlament Lvivskoi oblasnoi prokuratury. URL: https://lviv.gp.gov.ua/ua/funktion.html?_m=publications&_t=rec&id=256258 [Regulations of the Lviv Regional Prosecutor's Office. URL: https://lviv.gp.gov.ua/ua/funktion.html?_m=publications&_t=rec&id=256258] [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2024-10-24

Issue

Section

CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY. THE PENAL LAW. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CRIMINALISTICS. FORENSIC EXAMINATION. OPERATIONAL AC

How to Cite

Kucheriavyi, Petro. “Reporting Note As a Type of Prosecutorial Response in Section of the Functions of the prosecutor’s Bodies”. Actual Problems of Law, no. 2, Oct. 2024, pp. 85-89, https://doi.org/10.35774/app2024.02.085.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 539

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.