Jury trial in criminal proceedings: theoretical principles and realities of application in Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2025.01.106Keywords:
jury system, criminal proceedings, justice, popular sovereignty, judicial reform, legal guarantees, legal culture, democratizationAbstract
This article explores the theoretical foundations and practical aspects of introducing the jury system in criminal proceedings in Ukraine, which represents an important element of judicial reform. The study highlights that the jury system is one of the oldest legal institutions that contributes to increasing the transparency of justice, strengthening citizens’ trust in the judicial system, and reducing political influence. The article primarily focuses on the introduction of the jury system in Ukraine, specifically the mixed model, which involves both professional judges and jurors in criminal cases that may result in life imprisonment. The research discusses the key challenges Ukraine may face during the implementation of this institution, including the need for juror training, financing of the system, and potential risks related to emotional or unjust decisions.
The article also examines the positive potential of the jury system in transforming approaches to criminal trials, particularly in improving argumentation from both parties and developing standards of evidence. An important part of the study is the discussion of how the introduction of the jury system can affect the legal culture in Ukraine and foster citizens’ responsibility for the administration of justice.
The author emphasizes that for the successful implementation of the jury system in Ukraine, it is essential to consider the experiences of other countries, develop educational programs for jurors, and ensure adequate funding for the proper organization of the judicial process. At the same time, a clear legislative framework is necessary for the effective functioning of this mechanism in Ukraine.
References
Berch, V. (2024). Hybridna model sudu prysiazhnykh: dosvid Avstrii ta Danii. [Hybrid model of the jury court: experience of Austria and Denmark]. Aktualni pytannia u suchasnii nautsi – Current Issues in Modern Science, 5(23). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6300-2024-5(23)-428-434 [in Ukrainian]
Berch, V. (2024). Uchast narodu u realizatsii sudovoi vlady cherez sud prysiazhnykh u Belhii [People’s participation in the exercise of judicial power through the jury court in Belgium]. Naukovi innovatsii ta peredovi tekhnolohii – Scientific Innovations and Advanced Technologies, 5(33). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-5274-2024-5(33)-487-494 [in Ukrainian]
Bielova, O. I. & Bumaha, K. Yu. (2023). Sud prysiazhnykh: dosvid inozemnykh derzhav ta perspektyvy rozvytku v Ukraini [Jury court: experience of foreign states and prospects for development in Ukraine]. International Science Journal of Jurisprudence & Philosophy, 2(3), 30–44. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjjp.20230203.02 [in Ukrainian]
Bohdanov, Ye. (2024). A. Instytut prysiazhnykh v Ukraini: suchasni vyklyky ta perspektyvy reformuvannia [The jury institution in Ukraine: current challenges and prospects for reform]. Expert Paradigm of Law and Public Administration. 2024, 4(32), 13-18. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2024-4(32)-13-18 [in Ukrainian]
Dronshkevych, Ye. O. (2020). Sud prysiazhnykh u kryminalnomu provadzhenni. [Jury trial in criminal proceedings]. Thesis. 2020. Retrieved from https://er.nau.edu.ua/handle/NAU/50892 [in Ukrainian]
Zima, K. A. (2024). Istoryko-pravova heneza derzhavnykh harantii sudu prysiazhnykh. [Historical and legal genesis of state guarantees of the jury court]. Derzhavne upravlinnia udoskonalennia ta rozvytok – Public Administration Improvement and Development, 9. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2156.2024.9.17 [in Ukrainian]
Lohoyko, O. (2023). Uchast prokurora u sudi prysiazhnykh. [Prosecutor’s participation in the jury trial]. Naukovі perspektyvy – Scientific Perspectives. 12(30). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.52058/2708-7530-2022-12(30)-359-366 [in Ukrainian]
Overchuk, V. A. (2022). Indyvidualno-psykholohichni osoblyvosti prysiazhnykh ukrainskykh sudiv [Individual psychological characteristics of jurors in Ukrainian courts]. Dniprovskyi naukovyi chasopys publichnoho upravlinnia, psykholohii, prava – Dnipro Scientific Journal of Public Administration, Psychology, Law, 5, 49-53. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2021.5.7 [in Ukrainian]
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Pro pryiniattia za osnovu proektu Zakonu Ukrainy pro sud prysiazhnykh: Postanova Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy vid 05.12.2024 No. 4127-IX [On the adoption as a basis of the draft Law of Ukraine on the jury court: Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine dated 05.12.2024 No. 4127-IX]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4127-20#Text [in Ukrainian]
Smirnova, V. V. (2020). Pravovyi status prysiazhnykh u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy. [Legal status of jurors in civil proceedings in Ukraine]. Znannia yevropeiskoho prava – Knowledge of European Law, 2, 17-21. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32837/chern.v0i2.67 [in Ukrainian]
Chaika, S. P. (2021). Sud prysiazhnykh u kryminalnomu provadzhenni Ukrainy. [Jury court in the criminal procedure of Ukraine]. Thesis. 2021. Retrieved from https://er.nau.edu.ua/handle/NAU/53422 [in Ukrainian]
