The Legal Framework for the Functioning of Courts of Ukraine under Extraordinary Legal Regimes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/app2025.04.042

Keywords:

court, justice, judiciary, legal framework, state of emergency, martial law, legal regime, access to justice

Abstract

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the organization and functioning of Ukrainian courts under extraordinary legal regimes. The study covers the normative aspects of court operations during martial law, including the introduction of remote justice, changes in territorial jurisdiction, and the ensuring of participants’ safety.

The purpose of the article is to define the legal framework for the functioning of courts during extraordinary legal regimes, to identify its structural elements and hierarchy, and to determine the legal mechanisms that ensure the continuity and legality of judicial authority in extraordinary conditions.

The research methodology combines systemic, comparative-legal, and formal-legal analysis aimed at identifying the content, structure, and mechanisms of operation of the legal framework of the judiciary under extraordinary legal regimes. This approach provides comprehensive coverage of all levels of normative regulation.

The concept of «legal framework» is clarified and distinguished from related terms. It is established that the legal framework is the normative foundation; legal regulation is the process of the norms’ influence on social relations; and legal support is the mechanism for organizing and maintaining the implementation of legal provisions. It is proposed to define the legal framework for the functioning of courts under extraordinary legal regimes as a hierarchical set of legal acts of varying legal force that determine their organization, powers, and procedures to ensure the continuity, stability, and legality of justice even under extraordinary conditions.

Among the key features of the legal framework of courts under extraordinary conditions are: a multi-level structure (constitutional, international, legislative, subordinate, and local levels), procedural flexibility (adaptation of procedural norms to remote participation, changes in jurisdiction, and electronic document management), and a balance between access to justice and security ensured through an individual approach to each court’s operational mode. It is emphasized that the issue of the legal framework for the functioning of courts under emergency legal regimes requires further development through the formation of a unified concept of the legal support of justice.

References

1. Pypiak, M. I. (2016). Administratyvnyi sud u systemi orhaniv derzhavnoi vlady [Administrative court in the system of state authorities]. Candidate’s thesis. Lviv [in Ukrainian]

2. Fedorenko, T. V. (2023). Osoblyvosti zdiisnennia sudochynstva v umovakh voiennoho stanu [Peculiarities of judicial administration in the period of martial law]. Suchasnyi naukovyi zhurnal – Modern scientific journal, 1(1), 46–51 [in Ukrainian]

3. Teremetskyi, V., Zhuravlov, D., Boiko, V., Stratonov, V., Ilchenko, O., Glukh, M. et. al. (2023). Organization of courts operation in Ukraine in the period of martial law: comparative and legal research. Revista De Gestão E Secretariado, 14(10), 18976–18991 [in English]

4. Teremetskyi, V. I. & Duliba, Ye. V. (2023). Osoblyvosti vprovadzhennya ta funktsionuvannya Yedynoyi sudovoyi informatsiyno-telekomunikatsiynoyi systemy yak instrumenta elektronnoho pravosuddya [Peculiarities of Implementation and Functioning of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System as an E-Justice Tool]. Forum Prava - Forum of Law, 75(2), 130–143. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10007341 [in Ukrainian]

5. Nesterchuk, L. P. (2022). Orhanizatsiia diialnosti sudiv v umovakh voiennoho stanu v Ukraini [Organization of court operations in the period of martial law in Ukraine]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Ser.: Yurysprudentsiia – Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University. Ser.: Jurisprudence, 56, 127–131 [in Ukrainian]

6. Kozakevych, O. M. & Romanenko, A. O. (2024). Osoblyvosti administratyvnoi yurysdyktsii v umovakh pravovoho rezhymu voiennoho stanu. [Specifics of administrative jurisdiction under the legal regime of martial law]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal – Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 5, 301–304 [in Ukrainian]

7. Smokovych, M. I. (2022). Zdiisnennia pravosuddia v umovakh voiennoho stanu: do pytannia zakonodavchykh zmin [Administration of justice under martial law: on the issue of legislative changes]. Naukovyi visnyk UzhNU. Ser. «Pravo» – Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University. Law Ser., 70, 450–455 [in Ukrainian]

8. Bahmet, M. O. & Koval, H. V. (2012). Istoriia ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia i mistsevoho samovriaduvannia v Ukraini [History and practice of state administration and local self-government in Ukraine]. Mykolaiv: Chornomor. derzh. un-t im. Petra Mohyly. Mykolaiv [in Ulrainian]

9. Prylypko, V. M. (2022). Pravove rehuliuvannia suspilnykh vidnosyn: yikh typy ta efektyvnist [Legal regulation of social relations: their types and effectiveness]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal – Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 2, 62–64 [in Ukrainian]

10. Moskvych, L. M., Ivantsova, A. V., Ovsiannikova, O. O. et al. (2018). Pravovi osnovy administruvannia u sudi [Legal foundations of administration in court: a manual for students of law]. Kharkiv: Vyd-vo «Iurait» [in Ukrainian]

11. Melnychenko, B. (2017). Pravova osnova orhanizatsii ta diialnosti orhaniv publichnoho upravlinnia v Ukraini [Legal basis of the organization and activities of public administration bodies in Ukraine]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo – Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 12, 174–177 [in Ukrainian]

12. On Law-Making Activity [Pro pravotvorchu diialnist]. Zakon Ukrainy vid 24.08.2023 № 3354-IX. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3354-20#Text [in Ukrainian]

13. Kotiuk, V. O. (2015). Poniattia i vydy normatyvnykh aktiv [The concept and types of normative acts]. Sotsiolohiia prava – Sociology of Law, 3–4 (14–15), 157–161 [in Ukrainian]

14. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine]. Zakon Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 № 254к/96-ВР. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/25 4%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian]

15. Yevropeiska konventsiia z prav liudyny [European Convention on Human Rights] vid 04.11.1950. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_ 004#Text [in Ukrainian]

16. The Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, E/CN.4/1985/4. Retrieved from https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/1984/07/Siracusa-principles-ICCPR-legal-submission-1985-eng.pdf [in English]

17. Matvieieva, Yu. I. (2014). Tlumachennia poniattia «zakon» yak vymoha pryntsypu pravovoi vyznachenosti [Interpretation of the concept of “law” as a requirement of the principle of legal certainty]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Yurydychni nauky – Scientific Notes of NaUKMA. Legal Sciences, 155, 18–20 [in Ukrainian]

18. Pro pravovyi rezhym nadzvychainoho stanu [On the Legal Regime of a State of Emergency]. Zakon Ukrainy vid 16.03.2000 № 1550-III. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1550-14#Text [in Ukrainian]

19. Pro pravovyi rezhym voiennoho stanu [On the Legal Regime of Martial Law]. Zakon Ukrainy vid 12.05.2015 № 389-VII. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/389-19#Text [in Ukrainian]

20. Pro sudoustrii ta status suddiv [On the Judiciary and Status of Judges]. Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 № 1402-19. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text [in Ukrainian]

21. Boiko, V. P. (2020). Klasyfikatsiia normatyvno-pravovykh aktiv u sferi rehuliuvannia orhaniv sudovoi vlady v Ukraini [Classification of normative legal acts in the sphere of regulation of the judiciary in Ukraine]. Naukovyi visnyk publichnoho i pryvatnoho prava – Scientific Bulletin of Public and Private Law, 6, 68–74 [in Ukrainian]

22. Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy, spriamovanykh na zabezpechennia dodatkovykh sotsialnykh ta ekonomichnykh harantii u zviazku z poshyrenniam koronavirusnoi khvoroby (COVID-19) [On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Aimed at Ensuring Additional Social and Economic Guarantees in Connection with the Spread of COVID-19]. Zakon Ukrainy vid 30.03.2020 № 540-IX. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/540-20#Text [in Ukrainian]

23. Pro vnesennia zmin do Hospodarskoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy, Tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy ta Kodeksu administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy shchodo vdoskonalennia uchasti u sudovomu zasidanni v rezhymi videokonferentsii [On Amendments to the Commercial Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine and the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine Regarding the Improvement of Participation in Court Hearings via Videoconference]. Zakon Ukainy vid 23.05.2024 № 3755-IX. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3755-20#Text [in Ukrainian]

24. Teplyuk, M. O. & Yushchyk, O. I. (2024). Poniattia ta klasyfikatsiia pravovykh aktiv: yurydychnyi vymir [The concept and classification of legal acts: a legal dimension]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy – Bulletin of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 31(2), 34–45 [in Ukrainian]

25. Boiko, V. P. (2023). Administratyvno-pravovi zasady pravosuddia v Ukraini [Administrative and Legal Foundations of Justice in Ukraine]. Doctor’s Thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian]

26. Rekomendatsii Rady suddiv Ukrainy Shchodo vstanovlennia osoblyvoho rezhymu roboty sudiv Ukrainy zadlia ubezpechennia naselennia Ukrainy vid poshyrennia hostrykh respiratornykh zakhvoriuvan ta koronovirusu COVID-19, yakyi vidneseno do osoblyvo nebezpechnykh infektsiinykh khvorob [Recommendations of the Council of Judges of Ukraine On establishing a special regime of court operation for protection against COVID-19] vid 17.03.2020 № 19. Retrieved from: https://ds.cn.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/sud 2506/News/karantin.pdf [in Ukrainian]

27. Shchodo vzhyttia nevidkladnykh zakhodiv dlia zabezpechennia staloho funktsionuvannia sudovoi vlady v Ukraini v umovakh prypynennia povnovazhen Vyshchoi rady pravosuddia ta voiennykh dii z boku Rosiiskoi Federatsi [On urgent measures to ensure stable functioning of the judiciary during termination of the HCJ’s powers and military aggression]. Rishennia Rady Suddiv Ukrainy vid 24.02.2022 № 9. Retrieved from https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/MUS36788? an=1 [in Ukrainian]

28. Okremi rekomendatsii orhanizatsii roboty sudiv ta suddiv v umovakh voiennoho stanu [On certain recommendations for organizing the work of courts and judges under martial law]. Rishennia Rady Suddiv Ukrainy vid 13.03.2022 № 10. Retrieved from: https://zib.com.ua/ua/150884.html/ [in Ukrainian]

29. Pro vidnovlennia roboty Khersonskoho miskoho sudu Khersonskoi oblasti, zminu terytorialnoi pidsudnosti sudovykh sprav okremykh sudiv Khersonskoi oblasti, vidterminuvannia pochatku vidnovlennia roboty Bilozerskoho raionnoho sudu Khersonskoi oblasti [On restoring the operation of Kherson City Court, changing territorial jurisdiction, and postponing reopening of Bilozerskyi District Court]. Rishennia Vyshchoi rady pravosuddia vid 30.05.2023 № 566/0/15-23. Retrieved from: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/ userfiles/media/new_folder_for_uploads/supreme /rozporyadjennya/566_30_05_202 3.pdf [in Ukrainian]

30. Rekomendatsii sudam pershoi ta apeliatsiinoi instantsii na vypadok zakhoplennia naselenoho punktu ta/abo sudu chy bezposerednoi zahrozy yoho zakhoplennia [Recommendations for courts in case of occupation or imminent threat]. Rozporiadzhennia Holovy Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 13.03.2022 № 6/0/9-22. Retrieved from: https://oda.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/new_folder_for_uploads/ dsa/rozp_6_VC_13_03_22.pdf [in Ukrainian]

31. Zaichuk, O. V. et al (2013). Suchasna pravova entsyklopediia [Modern Legal Encyclopedia]. Kyiv : Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].

32. Pro osoblyvosti roboty sudu v umovakh voiennoho stanu [On the specifics of court operation under martial law]. Rozporiadzhennia Holovy Shostoho apeliatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu vid 08.04.2022 № 2. Retrieved from https://6aas.gov.ua/ua/media-kaas/news/4947-pro-osoblivosti-roboti-sudu-v-umovak h-voennogo-stanu.html [in Ukrainian]

33. Pro zatverdzhennia Typovoho polozhennia pro aparat sudu [On Approval of the Standard Regulation on the Court Apparatus]. Nakaz Derzhavnoi sudovoi administratsii Ukrainy vid 08.02.2019 № 131. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0131750-19#Text [in Ukrainian]

Downloads

Published

2026-01-06

Issue

Section

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND PROCESS. FINANCE LAW. INFORMATION LAW. INTERNATIONAL LAW

How to Cite

Shliakhovchuk , Mykhailo. “The Legal Framework for the Functioning of Courts of Ukraine under Extraordinary Legal Regimes”. Actual Problems of Law, no. 4, Jan. 2026, pp. 42-50, https://doi.org/10.35774/app2025.04.042.