Сancellation of the notary's writ of execution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2021.03.117Keywords:
indisputability, debtor, recoverer, executive inscription, demand, notary, law, courtAbstract
The article presents a theoretical and legal analysis of the legal nature of the notary's writ of execution and, in particular, the grounds, procedure, terms and problems of its cancellation. The paper formulates objective and subjective preconditions for a notary to perform an executive inscription. Objective preconditions should be understood as public needs in a simplified procedure for ascertaining and terminating an undisputed offense and eliminating its consequences, which should be reproduced in the procedure of making a notarized writ of execution. Subjective preconditions for the execution of a writ of execution should be understood as the need for the notary and persons who have applied for notarial acts to comply with the Rules of certification of agreements provided by the Law of Ukraine «On Notaries».
It is concluded that in all respects regarding the writs of execution of notaries there are grounds for both notarial acts and the activities of judges. In this regard, it is emphasized that the notary's enforcement of an authentic act allows it to be enforced without going to court. However, such actions of the notary do not mean the actual recognition of legal certainty, indisputability or other related features of the obligations of the parties, expressed in the document on which the writ of execution is made. Assessments of the legal qualities of the described type of obligations of the parties are presumed by the notary formally legally without recourse to the relevant procedures that make up civil and commercial litigation, leaving the interested parties the initiative to participate in these proceedings.
References
Pro notariat: Zakon Ukrainu vid 05.08.2021 roku [About the notary: Law of Ukraine of August 5, 2021]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3425-12#Text [in Ukrainian].
Postanova Velukoi Palaty Verkhovnogo Sudu u spravi №137/1666/16-ц від 27 bereznia 2019 roku (provadjenia № 14-84цс19) [Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court in case № 137/1666/16-ц of March 27, 2019 (proceedings № 14-84tss19)]. Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/80854768] [in Ukrainian].
Postanova Velukoi Palaty Verkhovnogo Sudu u spravi №916/3006/17 від 2 lupnia 2019 roku. [Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court in case № 916/3006/17 of July 2, 2019]. Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82827046 [in Ukrainian].
Levchenko, A. & Kyryliuk, D. (2017). Problemni aspekty vchunennia vukonavchuh napusiv notariusa na dogovorah zastavu ta ipoteky [Problematic aspects of making notarial writs of execution on mortgage and mortgage agreements]. Yurydychnyi Radnyk – Legal Adviser, 3 (93), 29-38 [ in Ukrainian].
Pro vykonavche provadjenia: Zakon Ukrainu vid 29.08.2021 roku. [On enforcement proceedings: Law of Ukraine of August 29, 2021]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1404-19#Text [in Ukrainian].
Levin, G. D. (2011). Tri vzgliada na teoriyu teoreticheskogo ta empericheskogo znania [Three views on the nature of theoretical and empirical knowledge]. Voprosy filosofii – Questions of philosophy, 2, 104-115.
Tsuvilnyi kodecs Ukrainy vid 14.08.2021 roku [Civil Code of Ukraine of August 14, 2021]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text [ in Ukrainian].
Ponamarov, N. M. & Kostkina, U. O. (2012). Osobluvosti rozhliadu gospodarskymy sudamy sporiv pro vyznania vykonavchyh nadpysiv takymy, shcho ne pidliagayt vykonaniu [Peculiarities of consideration by commercial courts of disputes on recognition of writs of execution as non-enforceable]. Uzhhorod, 2012. №20. Retrieved from http://artimmer.com/ua/publicacii/statti/77-osoblyvosti-rozglyadu-gospodarskymy-sudamy-sporiv-pro-vyznannya-vykonavchyh-napysiv-notariusiv-takymy-scho-ne-pidlyagayut-vykonannyu [in Ukrainian].
Zhelihovska, U. V. (2011). Stiagnenia zaborgovanosti za vekseliamu, oprotestovanymy notariusamy v vstanovlenomy zakonom poriadky [Debt collection on promissory notes protested by notaries in the manner prescribed by law]. Mala entsyclopedia notariusa – A small encyclopedia of a notary, 4, 77–82 [in Ukrainian].
Nelin, O. (2013). Pravova pryroda notarialnogo akta v novitniy paradygmi ukrainskogo prava [The legal nature of the notarial act in the latest paradigm of Ukrainian law]. Pravova Ukraina – Legal of Ukraine, 11, 4-8 [in Ukrainian].
Svertnyk, A. G. (2020). Vykonavchyi napys notariusa yak sposib realizacii notarialnoi formy zahusty cuvilnyh prav [The executive inscription of the notary as a way of realization of the notarial form of protection of civil rights]: dis. … doctora filosofii: spets 081 – Pravo. Kyiv, 2020 [in Ukrainian].
Demchenko, O. (2019). Vykonavchyy napys notariusa yak pozasydova forma zahusty cuvilnyh prav ta zakonnuh interesiv [Notary’s writ of execution as an extrajudicial form of protection of civil rights and legitimate interests]. Pidpryemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo – Entrepreneurship, economy and law. Zaporozhye, 3, 15-19 [in Ukrainian].
