Psychological training of a lawyer as the basis of professional practical activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2022.04.006Keywords:
lawyer, psychology, psychological training, professional practical activity, higher legal educationAbstract
The article presents the results of the study of actual features of the psychological training of a lawyer as the basis of professional legal practice. The main practical personal psychological skills that a lawyer can develop and should use in the process of professional practical activity are considered. A perspective on the use of psychological knowledge in the educational process of a higher school for lawyers is offered.
The conclusions state that the modern complex conditions of social development in our country make the profession of a lawyer particularly in demand. Since it is closely integrated into society, psychological preparation, understanding of laws, approaches, techniques and methods of psychology as a science and practice comes first in practical legal activity, in addition to acquired professional knowledge during training. A new quality of legal specialist training is not possible without taking into account and applying ideas, methods, practical approaches and analysis of situations inherent in the science of psychology. Knowledge of the psychology of a lawyer and other subjects of legal relations should become thorough in the system of training lawyers in higher education, which is increasingly becoming practically oriented.
References
Marshalok, S. I. (2013). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti profesiinoi diialnosti fakhivtsiv yurydychnoi sfery [Psychological features of the professional activity of specialists in the legal field.]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. Seriia psykholohichna. – Scientific Bulletin of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs. The series is psychological, 1, 179-187 [in Ukrainian].
Burgess, H. (2011). Deepening the Discourse Using the Legal Minds’ Eye: Lessons from Neuroscience and Psychology that Optimize Law School Learning, ed29 Quinnipiac L. Rev. [in English].
Sternlight, Jean R. and Robbennolt, Jennifer K. (2015). Psychology and Effective Lawyering: Insights for Legal Educators. Journal of Legal Education, 64 (3), Number 3, 365-384 [in English].
Bed, V. V. (2004). Yurydychna psykholohiia: navch. posib. [Legal psychology: teaching. manual]. 2-he vyd., dop. i pererobl. Kyiv: MAUP [in Ukrainian].
Konovalova, V., Shepitko V. (2004). Yurydychna psykholohiia: akademichnyi kurs [Yurydychna psykholohiia: akademichnyi kurs]: pidruch. dlia stud. yuryd. spets. vyshch. navch. zakl. Kyiv: In Yure [in Ukrainian]
Iurydychna psykholohiia [Legal psychology] (2000): pidruchnyk dlia stud. vuz.; red. Ya. Yu. Kondratiev. Kyiv: In Yure [in Ukrainian].
Susan, C. W. What Do Legal Employers Want to See in New Graduates?: Using Focus Groups to Find Out, 39 OHIO N.U. L. REv. 505 (13) [in English].
David, R. Caruso & Salovey, P. (2004). The emotionally intelligent manager [in English].
Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K. (2002). Like Goes with Like: The Role of Representativeness in Erroneous and Pseudo-Scientific Beliefs, in Heuristics and Biases: the Psychology of Intuitive Judgment 617 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808098.036
Barbara, Glesner (2013). Fines, Out of the Shadows: hat Legal Research Instruction Reveals About Incorporating Skills Throughout the Curriculum, 2013J. Disp. RESOL. 159, 174 [in English].
Levit, N., Linder. (2010). Tie Happy Lawyer: Making A Good Life In The Law [in English].
