Institutionalization of Legal Institutions as a Theoretical and Methodological Basis for the Study of Legal Clinics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2026.01.012Keywords:
legal institution, institutionalization, legal system, legal regulation, social practices, legal clinics, legal educationAbstract
The article provides a comprehensive theoretical and methodological analysis of approaches to understanding the institutionalization of legal institutions in contemporary legal science. It is substantiated that institutionalization should be considered as a complex multi-level process that includes the formation, legal formalization, organizational structuring, and functional stabilization of socially significant legal practices. The main scientific approaches to the interpretation of institutionalization are identified, including normative, socio-legal, and comprehensive (institutional) approaches, and their heuristic potential for the study of modern legal phenomena is examined.
The research methodology is based on a complex combination of several methods. The comparative method is used to study the use of legal terminology, a doctrinal analysis of modern scientific literature is carried out, and individual legislative provisions are studied using the analysis and synthesis method.
The study demonstrates the limitations of the purely normative approach, which fails to take into account the social nature of legal institutions, and justifies the need for a comprehensive approach that integrates normative, organizational, and functional dimensions. Particular attention is paid to the relationship between formal and informal components of institutionalization, which significantly influence the effectiveness of legal institutions in practice. It is argued that the level of institutionalization depends not only on the existence of legal regulation, but also on the degree of social recognition, stability of practices, and integration into the legal system.
The applicability of these theoretical approaches to the study of legal clinics as a specific type of legal institution operating at the intersection of legal and educational systems is substantiated. It is concluded that the use of a comprehensive methodological framework provides a solid basis for further comparative legal analysis of the institutionalization of legal clinics.
Downloads
References
1. Averianov, V. B. (2014). Teoriia derzhavy i prava [Theory of state and law]. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian]
2. Bobrovnyk, S. V. (2018). Pravova systema ta yii instytuty: teoretyko-metodolohichnyi analiz [Legal system and its institutions: theoretical and methodological analysis]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian]
3. Holovatyi, S. P. (2017). Verkhovenstvo prava [Rule of law] (Vol. 1). Kyiv: Feniks [in Ukrainian]
4. Zhuravskyi, V. S. (2019). Pravovi instytuty v umovakh transformatsii suspilstva [Legal institutions in conditions of social transformation]. Kyiv: Yurydychna dumka [in Ukrainian]
5. Kopylenko, O. L., & Kresina, I. O. (2020). Suchasni pidkhody do rozuminnia pravovykh instytutiv [Modern approaches to understanding legal institutions]. Pravo Ukrainy – Law of Ukraine, (3), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.33498/louu-2020-03-108 [in Ukrainian]
6. Kuzmenko, O. V. (2021). Instytutsionalizatsiia pravovykh vidnosyn u suchasnomu suspilstvi [Institutionalization of legal relations in modern society]. Yurydychna nauka – Legal sciense, 2, 130–138. https://doi.org/10.32844/2222-5374-2021-2-15 [in Ukrainian]
7. Melnyk, M. I. (2020). Yurydychni kliniky v Ukraini: suchasnyi stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Legal clinics in Ukraine: current state and development prospects]. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy – Bulletin of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 4, 3–12.
https://doi.org/10.31359/1993-0909-2020-27-4-3 [in Ukrainian]
8. Rabinovych, P. M. (2016). Osnovy zahalnoi teorii prava ta derzhavy [Fundamentals of general theory of law and state]. Lviv: Svit [in Ukrainian]
9. Skakun, O. F. (2018). Teoriia prava i derzhavy [Theory of law and state]. Kharkiv: Konsum [in Ukrainian]
10. Shemshuchenko, Yu. S. (Ed.) (2011). Yurydychna entsyklopediia [Legal encyclopedia], Vol. 3. Kyiv: Ukrainska entsyklopediia [in Ukrainian]
11. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
12. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
13. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
14. Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44 (5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
