Legal measures of a cassational appeal against decisions of the court of first instance and decisions of the court of appeal in administrative proceedings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2026.01.061Keywords:
cassation appeal, administrative proceedings, cassation filters, procedure, judicial review, admissibility of the complaintAbstract
Relevance. The legal dimension of cassational appeal in Ukrainian administrative proceedings requires comprehensive analysis in the context of ongoing judicial reforms and European integration. Contemporary challenges include the need for effective judicial control mechanisms, uniform application of legal norms, and implementation of "cassational filters" that impact access to justice. Recent amendments to procedural legislation and evolving judicial practice necessitate examination of cassational procedures to ensure compliance with European standards of justice.
Research objective. This study aims to analyze the legal dimension of cassational appeal procedures for first instance and appellate court decisions in Ukrainian administrative proceedings. The research evaluates the role of cassational courts in ensuring justice and legality while examining fundamental principles including the rule of law, legal certainty, and access to justice. The study identifies existing gaps in legislation and judicial practice, proposing solutions for enhancing cassational control mechanisms.
Research methodology. The research employs a multidisciplinary methodological approach combining comparative legal analysis, systematic analysis of current legislation, and examination of judicial practice. The study utilizes formal-logical methods for analyzing legal concepts and institutions, comparative methodology for evaluating international experience in cassational proceedings, and empirical analysis of court decisions to identify practical challenges and trends. The research also incorporates elements of sociological and statistical analysis to assess the effectiveness of cassational procedures and their impact on access to justice.
Research results. The study reveals significant challenges in the current system of cassational appeals in administrative proceedings, including limitations in cassational court powers, procedural inefficiencies, prolonged case review periods, and unequal access to justice. The analysis demonstrates that the implementation of cassational filters in minor cases, while intended to reduce judicial workload, has created additional barriers to effective legal protection. The research identifies key areas requiring legislative and procedural improvements, including enhanced clarity in cassational grounds, streamlined procedures for case admission, and better integration of European standards of judicial review. The findings contribute to the development of recommendations for reforming administrative court proceedings and improving the overall effectiveness of judicial control mechanisms in Ukraine.
Downloads
References
1. Bobechko, N. R. (2016). Apeliatsine ta kasatsiine provadzhennia u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy [Appellate and cassational proceedings in criminal proceedings of Ukraine]. (Doctor's thesis). Lvivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Ivana Franka, Lviv [in Ukrainian]
2. Bohoslov, A. V. (2025). Instytut kasatsiinoho perehliadu sudovykh rishen u spravakh pro administratyvni pravoporushennia [Institute of cassational review of court decisions in cases of administrative offenses]. Istoryko-pravovyi chasopys – Historical and Legal Journal, 1, 42-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2409-4544/2025-1/6 [in Ukrainian]
3. Hlushchenko, S. V. (2010). Kasatsiine oskarzhennia yak konstytutsiina zasada perevirky sudovykh rishen [Cassational appeal as a constitutional principle for reviewing court decisions]. (Extended abstract of Candidate's thesis). Kyiv [in Ukrainian]
4. Husarov, K. V. (2010). Perehliad sudovykh rishen v apeliatsiinomu ta kasatsiinomu poriadkakh: monohrafiia [Review of court decisions in appellate and cassation procedures: monograph]. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian]
5. Dorokhina, Yu. (2021). Peredumovy («filtry») kasatsiinoho oskarzhennia v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi: zmist, vydy, osoblyvosti, poriadok zastosuvannia [Prerequisites («filters») of cassational appeal in administrative proceedings: content, types, features, procedure of application], Law. State. Technology, 3, 67-77 [in Ukrainian]
6. Yevmin, A. M. (2016). Kasatsiine oskarzhennia sudovykh rishen u kryminalnomu provadzhennia [Cassational appeal of court decisions in criminal proceedings]. (Candidate's thesis). Natsionalna akademiia prokuratury, Kyiv [in Ukrainian]
7. Yemelianova, I. I. (n.d.). Teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty apeliatsiinoho i kasatsiinoho perehliadu sudovykh rishen u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi [Theoretical and practical aspects of appellate and cassational review of court decisions in civil proceedings]. Retrieved from https://minjust.gov.ua/m/str_1699 [in Ukrainian]
8. Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva [Code of Administrative Proceedings]. (2005). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy – Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 35-36, Art. 446 [in Ukrainian]
9. Kolesnikova, M. V. (2023). Deiaki problemni pytannia suchasnoho stanu kasatsiinoho rozgliadu administratyvnykh sprav [Some problematic issues of the current state of cassational review of administrative cases]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal – Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 2, 330-333 [in Ukrainian]
10. Kroitor, V.A. (2009). Pryntsyp zabezpechennia apeliatsiinoho ta kasatsiinoho oskarzhennia rishennia sudu [The principle of ensuring appellate and cassational appeal of court decisions]. Pravo i Bezpeka – Law and Security, 1, 198-205 [in Ukrainian]
11. Luspenyk, D. (n.d.). Kasatsiini filtry u tsyvilnykh spravakh: problemni pytannia sudovoho pravotlumachennia ta pravozastosuvannia [Cassational filters in civil cases: problematic issues of judicial interpretation and law application]. Retrieved from https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/pres-centr/zmi/954084/ [in Ukrainian]
12. Monaenko, A. (2018). Kasatsiini «filtry» [Cassational «filters»]. Yurydychna Hazeta online – Legal Gazette Online, 29-30(631-632). Retrieved from https://yurgazeta.com/publications/practice/sudova-praktika/kasaciyni-filtri.html [in Ukrainian]
13. Samara, V. S. (2024). Poniattia ta pravova sutnist pryntsypu kasatsiinoho oskarzhennia v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy [The concept and legal essence of the principle of cassational appeal in administrative proceedings of Ukraine]. Elektronne naukove vydannia «Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo» – Electronic Scientific Publication «Analytical and Comparative Law», 5, 610-615 [in Ukrainian]
14. Stafiichuk, K. V. (2020). Pravova pryroda kasatsiinoho provadzhennia v administratyvnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy [Legal nature of cassational proceedings in administrative proceedings of Ukraine]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal – Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, 8, 317-319 [in Ukrainian]
15. Tkachuk, N. V. (2021). Filtry kasatsiinoi skarhy v dii: efektyvnist mekhanizmu [Cassational complaint filters in action: mechanism effectiveness]. Aktualni problemy derzhavy i prava – Current Problems of State and Law, 89, 104-112 [in Ukrainian]
16. Berehovyi, I. (2025). Pravovi vidmovy vid apeliatsijnoi skarhy u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy [Legal refusals from appeal complaints in civil proceedings of Ukraine]. Aktualni problemy pravoznavstva – Actual Problems of Law, 4, 72-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/app2025.04.072 [in Ukrainian]
17. Verbitska, M. (2018). Ukladennia myrovykh uhod v apeliatsijnomu, kasatsijnomu provadzhennjakh u hospodarskomu protsesi ta na stadii vykonannja sudovykh rishen [Conclusion of settlement agreements in appellate and cassation proceedings in commercial process and at the stage of enforcement of court decisions]. Aktualni problemy pravoznavstva – Actual Problems of Law, 1, 124-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/app2018.01.124 [in Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
