Legal regulation of usufruct in the legislation of European countries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/app2026.01.148

Keywords:

usufruct, thing, property, property rights, usufructuary, bare owner

Abstract

The institution of usufruct, developed by Roman jurists, has had a significant impact on the evolution of modern property law. For its proper implementation and development in Ukraine, a thorough analysis of the civil law systems of European countries that have adopted this institution and have long-standing experience in its effective application to the regulation of property relations is of crucial importance. Among such countries are, first and foremost, the Germany and the France, whose civil legislation provides for comprehensive and systematic regulation of the right of usufruct. The article outlines the main provisions of usufruct under the French Civil Code and the German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch), including the concept of usufruct, the grounds for its creation and termination, as well as the rights and duties of the usufructuary and the owner. Emphasis is placed on the similarities and differences in their regulation. In addition, certain aspects of usufruct under the civil legislation of Italy and Poland are compared.

The purpose of the study is to examine the peculiarities of the legal regulation of usufruct in the legislation of European countries.

The research employs comparative-legal, formal-legal, and systemic-structural methods.

It is concluded that, despite the differences characteristic of particular legal systems, there is, in general, a unified approach to the legal nature of usufruct. The general rule is confirmed that the right of usufruct is possible only in cases of using a thing while preserving its substance. During use, changes in the condition of the property are permissible as long as they do not affect the possibility of restoring it to its previous state after the termination of the usufruct. Attention is drawn to the fact that in French and German civil legislation, despite the broad scope of the usufructuary’s powers – including the right to use the property “as the owner himself” – the usufructuary does not become the owner of the property during the usufruct, but remains a user of another’s property. A similar approach can be observed in other European legal systems, particularly in the Italian Civil Code and the Polish Civil Code.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Tsyura, V. V. (2024). Do pytannya vdoskonalennya pravovoho rehulyuvannya okremykh vydiv rechovykh prav u svitli onovlennya Tsyvilʹnoho kodeksu Ukrayiny [On the issue of improving the legal regulation of certain types of property rights in the light of the update of the Civil Code of Ukraine]. Abstracts of the scientific and practical conference: Tezy dopovidey naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi, prysvyachnoyi 99-y richnytsi vid dnya narodzhennya O.A. Pushkina «Problemy tsyvilnoho prava ta protsesu» - Theses of additional participants of the scientific-practical conference, dedicated to the 99th anniversary of the birth of O.A. Pushkin «Problems of civil law and process», 103-108 [in Ukrainian]

2. Zakon Ukrayiny «Pro osoblyvosti rehulyuvannya diyalnosti yurydychnykh osib okremy orhanizatsiyno-pravovykh form u perekhidnyy period ta obyednan yurydychnykh osib» [Law of Ukraine «On the Features of Regulation of the Activities of Legal Entities of Certain Organizational and Legal Forms in the Transitional Period and Associations of Legal Entities»]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4196-20#Text [in Ukrainian]

3. Trubakov, Ye. O. (2025). Deyaki problemni pytannya implementatsiyi zakonu №4196-IX [Some problematic issues of the implementation of law № 4196-IX]. Rekodyfikatsiya rechovoho prava: zbirnyk materialiv KHIV Mizhnarodnoho tsyvilistychnoho forumu. Odesa: Yurydyka, 143-147 [in Ukrainian]

4. Maydanyk, R. A., Maydanyk, N. I., & Popova, N. R. (2021). Yevropeyizatsiya ta rekodyfikatsiya.Uzufrukt. [Europeanization and recodification. Usufruct]. Visnyk Kyyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka - Bulletin of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 4 (119), 40-50. DOI: 10.17721/1728-2195/2021/4.119-8 [in Ukrainian]

5. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB). URL: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/ [in German]

6. Code civil français. URL: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006429233 [in French]

7. Bamdé, A. (2020). Les obligations de l’usufruitier. URL: https://aurelienbamde.com/2020/04/04/les-obligations-de-lusufruitier/ [in French]

8. Cour de cassation, 3e chambre civile, arrêt du 2 février 2005, № 03-19.729. Retrieved from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/juri/id/JURITEXT000007049869 [in French]

9. Acquisition de l'usufruit par usucapion. 07 jillet 2022. Retrieved from https://onb-france.com/actualites/acquisition-de-lusufruit-par-usucapion?utm_source=chatgpt.com [in French]

10. Bamdé, A (2020). Les droits de l’usufruitier. Retrieved from https://aurelienbamde.com/2020/04/02/les-droits-de-lusufruitier/ [in French]

11. Tribunal judiciare de Paris, 10 octobre 2024, 24/10440. Retrieved from https://justice.pappers.fr/decision/db9c839a57a7283699f42e2242e3095a236c7326?utm_source=chatgpt.com [in French]

12. Zhornokuy, Yu. M. (2025). Uzufrukt chy dovircha vlasnist: pytannya zastosuvannya konstruktsiy u ramkakh upravlinnya yurydychnoyu osoboyu [Usufruct or trust property: the issue of applying constructions within the framework of managing a legal entity]. Rekodyfikatsiya rechovoho prava: zbirnyk materialiv KHIV Mizhnarodnoho tsyvilistychnoho forumu - Recodification of Property Law: Proceedings of the 14th International Civil Law Forum (Kyiv, 16 May 2025). Odesa: Yurydyka, 60-64 [in Ukrainian]

13. L’Usufruit Viager en Débat : Enjeux, Contentieux et Perspectives. Retrieved from https://www.juridique-ressources.fr/lusufruit-viager-en-debat-enjeux-contentieux-et-perspectives/?utm_source=chatgpt.com [in French]

14. Codice Civile 2023: aggiornato con le ultime modifiche legislative apportate dal D. Lgs. 10 ottobre 2022, n. 149, come modificato dalla L. 29 dicembre 2022, n. 197 («Riforma Cartabia»). (R.D. 16 marzo 1942, n. 262). Retrieved from https://www.brocardi.it/codice-civile/ [in Italian]

15. Kodeks cywilny. Ustawa z dnia 23 kwietnia 1964 r. Retrieved from https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19640160093/U/D19640093Lj.pdf [in Polish]

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

Issue

Section

CIVIL LAW AND CIVIL PROCESS. FAMILY LAW. INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW. COMMERCIAL LAW. COMMERCIAL-PROCEDURAL LAW.

How to Cite

Pankivskyi , Volodymyr. “Legal Regulation of Usufruct in the Legislation of European Countries”. Actual Problems of Law (Aktual’ni Problemi Pravoznavstva), no. 1, May 2026, pp. 148-54, https://doi.org/10.35774/app2026.01.148.