Some questions regarding freedom from self-disclosure as one of the principles of the criminal procedure

Authors

  • Petro Dekailo West Ukrainian National University
  • Volodymyr Babiy West Ukrainian National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/app2023.01.179

Keywords:

freedom from self-incrimination, the right not to testify against close relatives and family members, the basis of criminal procedural law, abuse of law, criminal proceedings, suspect, accused, investigation, criminal liability

Abstract

One of the principles of criminal proceedings - freedom from self-incrimination and the right not to testify against close relatives and family members - is analyzed in detail. The main disadvantages of its use directly in practice have been identified. The opinions of numerous scientists, the practice of the ECtHR and the experience of foreign countries regarding the application of the above-mentioned principles of the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine were considered. Based on this, a number of proposals for improving the effective use of this principle are highlighted.

It is worth noting that the entire criminal process must be carried out in compliance with all 22 principles provided for by the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. Any procedural actions committed in violation or non-compliance with at least one of them becomes illegal. That is why it is extremely important for all participants in criminal proceedings to understand in detail, and most importantly, the meaning and essence of each of these principles, without exception. Because it depends on the observance of human rights, the establishment of justice and, above all, the decision of people's fate. A detailed explanation of each of the principles, the search for ways to improve, the elimination of conflicts in the current legislation and the exclusion of the possibility of abusing the rights arising from these principles are no less important than their observance in criminal proceedings.

References

Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine] vid 28.06.1996 r. Data onovlennia: 01.01.2020. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254% D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian]

Kryminalno protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine] vid 13.04.2012 r. Data onovlennia: 01.10.2022. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text [in Ukrainian]

Abbasova, D. L. (2021). Prymusove vidibrannia biolohichnykh zrazkiv dlia provedennia ekspertyzy i pravo na svobodu vid samovykryttia. Etychno-pravova dylema.[Forced selection of biological samples for examination and the right to freedom from self-disclosure. An ethical and legal dilemma]. Kryminalna yustytsiia v Ukraini: realii ta perspektyvy: materialy kruhloho stolu – Criminal justice in Ukraine: realities and prospects: materials of the round table, m. Lviv, 11 cherv. 2021. Lviv, 141–146 [in Ukrainian]

Boreiko, H. D. (2022). Obmova pidozriuvanym (obvynuvachenym) zavidomo nevynuvatoi osoby yak svoboda vid samovykryttia chy zlovzhyvannia pravom? [ebating a suspect (accused) of a known innocent person as freedom from self-exposure or abuse of the right?] Prykarpatskyi yurydychnyi visnyk. Kryminalnyi protses, kryminalistyka – Carpathian Legal Gazette. Criminal process, criminology, № 2(43), 118-121 [in Ukrainian]

Kravchuk, O. & Ostashchuk, I. (2021). Sudovi prysiahy, yak skladnyk sudovoi symvoliky [Court oaths as a component of court symbols]. Yurydychnyi visnyk. Metodolohiia teorii i praktyky yurysprudentsii – Legal Bulletin. Methodology of the theory and practice of jurisprudence. Odesa, 1, 7-19 [in Ukrainian]

Lysachenko, S. (2018). Okremi prymusovi zasoby otrymannia vidomostei vid osoby u kryminalnomu dosudovomu provadzhenni u konteksti svobody vid samovykryttia ta prava ne svidchyty proty blyzkykh rodychiv ta chleniv simyi [Separate coercive means of obtaining information from a person in criminal pre-trial proceedings in the context of freedom from self-disclosure and the right not to testify against close relatives and family members]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo – Entrepreneurship, economy and law, 6, 316-321 [in Ukrainian]

Navrotska, V. V. (2020). Pravo na svobodu vid samovykryttia, vykryttia chleniv simi chy blyzkykh rodychiv yak odna iz protsesualnykh harantii [The right to freedom from self-exposure, exposure of family members or close relatives as one of the procedural guarantees]. Visnyk LDUVS im. E. O. Didorenka - Bulletin of the LDUVS named after E. O. Didorenko, 3(91), 127-138 [in Ukrainian]

Khyzhna, O. R. (2018). Svoboda vid samovykryttia ta pravo ne svidchyty proty blyzkykh rodychiv ta chleniv simi yak zasada u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Freedom from self-disclosure and the right not to testify against close relatives and family members as a basis in criminal proceedings]: avtoref. dys. ... kand. yur. nauk: 12.00.09, Kyiv, [in Ukrainian]

Tsyhanii, S. O. & Kuzmichova-Kyslenko, Ye. V. (2022). Suchasni pidkhody do zasad kryminalnoho provadzhennia [9. Tsyganii S. O., Kuzmichova-Kyslenko E. V. Modern approaches to the principles of criminal proceedings]. Naukovi innovatsii ta peredovi tekhnolohii – Scientific innovations and advanced technologies, 7 (9), 278-287 [in Ukrainian]

Yaremko, H. Z. (2021). Mezhi svobody vid samovykryttia ta vykryttia blyzkykh rodychiv ta chleniv simi [Limits of freedom from self-exposure and exposure of close relatives and family members]. Kryminalna yustytsiia v Ukraini: realii ta perspektyvy [Criminal justice in Ukraine: realities and prospects]: materialy kruhloho stolu, m. Lviv, 11 cherv. 2021 r. Lviv, 111-117 [in Ukrainian]

Published

2023-06-16

Issue

Section

CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY. THE PENAL LAW. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CRIMINALISTICS. FORENSIC EXAMINATION. OPERATIONAL AC

How to Cite

Dekailo, Petro, and Volodymyr Babiy. “Some Questions Regarding Freedom from Self-Disclosure As One of the Principles of the Criminal Procedure”. Actual Problems of Law, no. 1, June 2023, pp. 179-86, https://doi.org/10.35774/app2023.01.179.