Some peculiarities of using interrogation results under martial law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2026.01.198Keywords:
interrogation, martial law, collaboration activity, prisoners of war, admissibility of evidence, human rights, psychological vulnerability, criminal proceedingsAbstract
The article examines the procedural aspects of using the results of interrogation as a source of evidence in criminal proceedings under martial law. It analyzes the current legislation governing the questioning of witnesses, victims, suspects, prisoners of war, and persons with related status, taking into account the conditions of armed conflict while ensuring compliance with the constitutional rights and freedoms of the persons being questioned. The study explores current issues concerning the admissibility of testimony obtained in emergency situations, the impact of the interviewees’ psycho-emotional state, failures to observe procedural safeguards, and moral pressure that restricts rights and freedoms.
The specific features of interrogation in criminal proceedings related to crimes against the foundations of national security are substantiated, including high treason, collaboration activities, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. A distinctive characteristic of such proceedings is that they are marked not only by high legal complexity but also by strong emotional intensity, which significantly affects the behavior of both the persons questioned and investigators. The necessity of adapting investigative tactics to the conditions of armed conflict is emphasized, along with the introduction of specialized methods for working with individuals suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and ensuring appropriate support from defense attorneys, psychologists, and medical professionals.
Considerable attention is devoted to international legal aspects, including compliance with the provisions of the Geneva Conventions, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and the standards of the International Criminal Court regarding the admissibility of evidence. The importance of strict adherence to the principles of legality, humanism, and the rule of law is demonstrated as a foundation without which it is impossible to ensure the legitimacy of interrogation results at both the national and international levels.
Downloads
References
1. Vitvitskyi, S. S. & Otryshko, A. O. (2024). Dopyt svidkiv i pidozriuvanykh pry rozsliduvanni nezakonnoho povodzhennia zi zbroieiu, boiovymy prypasamy abo vybukhovymy rechovynamy [Interrogation of Witnesses and Suspects in the Investigation of Illegal Handling of Weapons, Ammunition or Explosives]. Tsentralnoukrainskyi visnyk prava ta publichnoho upravlinnia - Central Ukrainian Bulletin of Law and Public Administration, 3, 42–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/cuj-2024-3-5 [in Ukrainian]
2. Denysovskyi, M. D. & Rodenko, T. A. (2023). Taktychni osoblyvosti provedennia dopytu ta yikh kharakterystyka [Tactical Features of Conducting Interrogation and Their Characteristics]. Galician Studies: Law Sciences - Galician Studies: Law Sciences, 1, 17–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/galician_studies/law-2023-1-3 [in Ukrainian]
3. Kovalenko, V. V. (2024). Deiaki osoblyvosti dopytu svidkiv pid chas rozsliduvannia kolaboratsiinoi diialnosti [Certain Features of Witness Interrogation during the Investigation of Collaboration Activities]. Yurydychni nauky: problemy ta perspektyvy - Legal Sciences: Problems and Prospects. URL: https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-374-6-36 [in Ukrainian]
4. Korabel, M. H. & Pavlenko, T. A. (2024). Dopyt svidkiv ta poterpilykh osib vid okremykh katehorii voiennykh zlochyniv ta zlochyniv ahresii [Interrogation of Witnesses and Victims of Certain Categories of War Crimes and Crimes of Aggression]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University «Pravo» - Collection of Scientific Works of H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University «Law», 40, 137–142. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.34142/23121661.2024.40.16 [in Ukrainian]
5. Kryminalnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Kodeks Ukrainy vid 05.04.2001 No. 2341-III: stanom na 1 liut. 2025 r. [Criminal Code of Ukraine: Code of Ukraine of 05 April 2001 No. 2341-III as of 1 February 2025]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text [in Ukrainian]
6. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Kodeks Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 No. 4651-VI: stanom na 26 hrud. 2024 r. [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: Code of Ukraine of 13 April 2012 No. 4651-VI as of 26 December 2024]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17#Text (date of access: 22.04.2025) [in Ukrainian]
7. Novhorodska, I., Krykukha, R., Liubavina, V. (2024). Sutnist provedennia dopytu v umovakh voiennoho stanu: praktychni osoblyvosti [The Essence of Conducting Interrogation under Martial Law: Practical Features]. Molodyi vchenyi - Young Scientist, 7 (131), 181–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32839/978-966-397-428-6-10 (date of access: 22.04.2025) [in Ukrainian]
8. Pasichnichenko, D. (2024). Zarubizhnyi dosvid provedennia dopytu vrazlyvykh poterpilykh u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Foreign Experience in Conducting Interrogation of Vulnerable Victims in Criminal Proceedings]. Aktualni pytannia u suchasnii nautsi - Topical Issues in Modern Science, 7 (25). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-6300-2024-7(25)-473-480 [in Ukrainian]
9. Taktychni osoblyvosti provedennia dopytu v kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Tactical Features of Conducting Interrogation in Criminal Proceedings] (2023). Naukovyi Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho Derzhavnoho Universytetu Vnutrishnikh Sprav - Scientific Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, 6, 127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2078-3566-2023-6-207-212 [in Ukrainian]
10. Tashmatov, V. A. & Marushchak, A. P. (2024). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti dopytu nepovnolitnikh [Psychological Features of Interrogation of Minors]. Osobystist ta suspilstvo v tsyfrovu eru: psykholohichnyi vymir - Personality and Society in the Digital Era: Psychological Dimension: materials of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference, 183–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32837/11300.28049 (date of access: 22.04.2025) [in Ukrainian]
11. Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 2010. Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/publications/icrc-002-0173.pdf [in English]
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
