Ensuring effective counteraction to biological threats through the prism of biorisk design

Authors

  • Mariana Kravchuk West Ukrainian National University
  • Ihor Metelskyi West Ukrainian National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35774/app2022.01.091

Keywords:

biorisks, biohazard, biosafety, state, forms and methods of management, social environment

Abstract

The scientific article is devoted to the study of the classification of biorisks on the basis of their characteristic features. This objective need is due to the important issue of ensuring a constructive approach to improving the effectiveness of a set of measures to combat bioterrorism, optimizing methods and techniques, means and methods of its use in practice of prevention and cessation of bioterrorist acts. It should also be noted that when researching the issue of biological risks, neither in the regulatory framework of Ukraine nor in international law, we do not find a comprehensive list of all types of hazards of biological origin formed and approved by the state. That is why the scientific study of this issue is relevant both theoretically and practically, as this knowledge will provide an opportunity to make the right choice of specific and effective administrative and legal measures to ensure biosafety. The study emphasizes that the relevant sources of danger of biological origin hide in themselves and under certain conditions by themselves or in various aggregates have a negative impact on society, pose a threat to human development and can lead to loss of human resources. These dangerous factors directly affect both the socio-political and socio-economic situation of the country, which, in turn, ensures the compliance of the human environment and its living needs. The consequences of such a danger can be a decline in living standards, loss of property, capital, work, income, investment, and so on. In addition, we should not forget about such basic parameters of the social environment as the need to receive services in the field of education, health, culture, social protection. It is concluded that today the latest pathogens, products of modern biotechnology, are constantly appearing, and, accordingly, the above classification of biorisks should not be taken as a dogma. Moreover, other approaches can be used in the study of this issue. However, the value of the authors of the list of biorisks is to minimize or eliminate them.

References

Akimova, T.A. & Haskin V.V. Ecologia: Uchebnik dlia vuzov [Ecology: A textbook for universities]. M .: UNITI, 1998. 455 p. /[in Russian].

Alymov V.T. & Tarasova N.P. Tehnogennyi risk. Analiz i otsenka: uchebnoe posobie dlia vuzov [Man-made risk. Analysis and evaluation: a textbook for universities]. M: IKTS "Akademkniga", 2004. 118 p. /[in Russian].

Balyuk G.I. Pravovi aspekty poniat’ yadernoi ta radiatsiinoi (radioecologichnoi bezpeky) [Legal aspects of the concepts of nuclear and radiation (radioecological) safety]. Pravo Ukrainy. 1999. № 12. 62–66 pp./[in Ukrainian].

Bulba V.G. & Yevtukhov O.V. Sotsial'ni ryzyky liuds’kogo rozvytku: sutnist’ ta mistse v derzhavnomu upravlinni [Social risks of human development: the essence and place in public administration]. Aktual’ni problemy derzhavnogo upravlinnia. 2017. № 2 (52). 1-6 pp./ [in Ukrainian].

Golubnycha V.M. Biobezpeka ta biozakhyst u biologichnykh laboratoriakh 1-go ta 2-go rivniv biobezpeky [Biosafety and biosecurity in biological laboratories of the 1st and 2nd levels of biosafety]: monography / of 10 ed. V.M. Golubnycha & M.V. Pogorelov & V.V. Kornienko. Sumy: Sumy State University, 2016. 123 p./ [in Ukrainian].

Danilov-Danilyan V.I. & Zalikhanov M. Ch. & Losev K.S. Ekologicheskaia bezopasnost’. Obshchie printsypy i rossiiskii aspect [Ecological safety. General principles and the Russian aspect]. M.:MNEPU, 2001. 332 p./ [in Russian].

Dobrovolskyi V.V. Ekologichna bezpeka i ryzyk: deiaki poniatiino-katehorial’ni utochnennia [Environmental safety and risk: some conceptual and categorical clarifications]. Ekologichna bezpeka. 2011. № 1. 17-20 pp./ [in Ukrainian].

DSP 9.9.5.035-99 Bezpeka roboty z mikroorganizmamy I-II grup patohennosti [Safety of work with microorganisms of I-II groups of pathogenicity]. arm.te.ua/docs/DSP_9_9_5035-99.pdf. Retrieved from http:// arm.te.ua/docs/DSP_9_9_5035-99.pdf/ [in Ukrainian].

Dubovik O.L. Analiz ekologicheskih riskov v Rossii. Sovremennoe ekologicheskoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom [Analysis of environmental risks in Russia. Modern environmental law in Russia and abroad]: collection of scientific works. M., 2001. 132-145 p./ [in Russian].

Zinchenko Y.V. Metodychni pidhody do analizu ekologichnogo ryzyku [Methodical approaches to environmental risk analysis]. Economichni innovatsii. Issue № 60. Book I. 2015. 141-153 p./ [in Ukrainian].

Otsinka i napriamky zmenshennia zahroz bioriznimanittiu Ukrainy [Estimation and directions of reduction of threats to biodiversity of Ukraine] of 10/ ed. Dudkin O.V. K.: Himgest, 2003. 400 p./ [in Ukrainian].

Zakon Ukrainy Pro veterynarnu medytsynu : pryiniatyi 25 cherv. 1992 roku № 2498-XII [Law of Ukraine on veterinary medicine from June 25 1992, № 2498-XII] (1992, September 8) Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy - Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 36, Art. 531 [in Ukrainian].

Zakon Ukrainy Pro derzhavnu systemu biobezpeky pry stvorenni, vyprobuvanni, transportuvanni ta vykorystanni genetychnomodyfikovanykh organizmiv: pryiniatyi 31 trav. 2007 roku № 1103-V [Law of Ukraine on the State System of Biosafety at the Time of Creating, Testing, Transporting, and Using Genetically Modified Organisms from May 31 2007, № 1103-V] (2007, August 31) Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy - Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 35, pp. 1137, Art. 484 [in Ukrainian].

Zakon Ukrainy Pro zabezbechennia sanitarnoho ta epidemichnoho blahopoluchchia naselennia: pryiniatyi 24 lut. 1994 roku № 4004-XII [Law of Ukraine on ensuring the sanitary and epidemic well-being of the population from February 24 1994, № 4004-XII] (1994, July 5) Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy - Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 27, Art. 218 [in Ukrainian].

Nakaz Ministerstva Okhorony zdorovia Pro zatverdzhennia pereliku kharchovykh produktiv, shchodo yakykh zdiisniuet’sia kontrol’ vmistu henetychno-modyfikovanykh organizmiv: vid 9 lyst. 2010 roku № 971 [On approval of the List of food products subject to control of the content of genetically modified organisms from November 9 2010, № 971]. zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show / z1248-10. Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show / z1248-10./ [in Ukrainian].

Zakon Ukrainy Pro karantyn roslyn: pryiniatyi 30 cherv. 1993 roku № 3348-XII [Law of Ukraine on plant quarantine from June 30 1993, № 3348-XII. (1993, August 24) Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy - Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 34, Art. 352./ [in Ukrainian].

Zakon Ukrainy Pro osnovni pryntsypy ta vymohy do bezpechnosti ta yakosti kharchovych produktiv: pryiniatyi 23 grud. 1997 roku № 771/97-VR [Law of Ukraine on the basic principles and requirements for food safety and quality from December 23 1997, № 771/97-VR. (1997, May 8) Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy - Information of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 19, Art. 98./ [in Ukrainian].

Upravlinnia bioryzykamy: posibnyk z laboratornoi bezpeky [Biorisk Management: A guide to laboratory biosafety]. bsseducation.com.ua/sites/default/files/WHO_CDS_EPR_2006_6_ ukr_ready_.pdf. Retrieved from http://www.bsseducation.com.ua/sites/default/files/WHO_CDS_EPR_2006_6_ ukr_ready_.pdf/ [in Ukrainian].

Published

2022-06-15

Issue

Section

CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY. THE PENAL LAW. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CRIMINALISTICS. FORENSIC EXAMINATION. OPERATIONAL AC

How to Cite

Kravchuk, Mariana, and Ihor Metelskyi. “Ensuring Effective Counteraction to Biological Threats through the Prism of Biorisk Design”. Actual Problems of Law, no. 1, June 2022, pp. 91-96, https://doi.org/10.35774/app2022.01.091.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 578

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.