Cybercrimes: types, financial intelligence, use of special knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2022.03.158Keywords:
cybercrime, types, financial intelligence, special knowledge, forensic expertise, economic expertise, computer-technical expertiseAbstract
It was determined that the investigation of cybercrimes remains a difficult task for investigative bodies, which is due to the specificity of this type of crime; the difficulties of summarizing the investigative and judicial materials under consideration; the lack of methodological recommendations regarding the organization of the investigation of criminal acts and the tactics of operational and investigative activities; insufficient qualifications of investigators to work with specific sources of evidenceThe necessity of using special knowledge in the investigation of cybercrimes is substantiated; the sequence of tasks of computer and technical research using special knowledge in the process of investigating cybercrimes is determined, namely: identification of databases of a specialized program; identification of programs for creating tax reporting and electronic document management systems; detection of information about payments made using network technologies. Involvement of an expert or specialist is the investigator's right, not an obligation. When investigating cybercrimes in the economic sphere, the problem arises of systematizing methodical approaches to the study of economic information in automated management systems in the light of complex computer-technical and economic expertise. It was concluded that when examining physical evidence in criminal cases regarding the investigation of economic cybercrimes, the most effective result will be a complex examination with the joint participation of experts in the field of economics and computer technology, since complexity is the most effective form of application of special knowledge. The requirements for the formulation of questions for research by an expert are important. An algorithm of tasks to be investigated using special knowledge in the investigation of cybercrimes in the field of economy is given. A typical task facing an expert is to search for databases with which work was performed, as well as to identify users who had access to one or another database, methods of approaching this task are highlighted.
References
Kiberzlochynnist v Ukrayini. Era tsyfrovykh tekhnolohiy – era novykh zlochyniv [Cybercrime in Ukraine. The era of digital technologies is the era of new crimes]. Retrieved from https://uz.ligazakon.ua/ua/magazine_article/EA013606 [in Ukrainian].
Kryminalnyi kodeks Ukrayiny: Zakon Ukrayiny vid 5.04. 2001 r. № 2341-III. [Criminal Code of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine dated April 5 2001 No. 2341-III]: Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14 [in Ukrainian].
Yedynyi zvit pro kryminalni pravoporushennya po derzhavi [Unified report on criminal offenses by state]. Retrieved from https://gp.gov.ua/ua/posts/pro-zareyestrovani-kriminalni-pravoporushennya-ta-rezultati-yih-dosudovogo-rozsliduvannya-2 [in Ukrainian].
Samoylenko, O. A. (2020). Vyyavlennya ta rozsliduvannya kiberzlochyniv: navchalʹno-metodychnyy posibnyk [Detection and investigation of cybercrimes]. Odesa, 112 р. [in Ukrainian].
Klymchuk, M. P., Komissarchuk, Yu. A., Marko, S. I., Stetsyk, B. V. (2022). Sudova kompyuterno-tekhnichna ekspertyza u kryminalnomu provadzhenni: navch. posib. [Forensic computer-technical expertise in criminal proceedings]. Lviv: Lvivskyi derzhavnyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav [in Ukrainian].
Instruktsiya pro pryznachennya ta provedennya sudovykh ekspertyz i ekspertnykh doslidzhen, zatverdzhena nakazom Ministerstva yustytsiyi Ukrayiny 10.08.98 n. 53/5 u redaktsiyi nakazu Ministerstva yustytsiyi Ukrayiny 26.12.2012 № 1950/5 [Instructions on the appointment and conduct of forensic examinations and expert studies]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98#Text [in Ukrainian].
Naukovo-metodychni rekomendatsiyi shchodo pidhotovky ta pryznachennya sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhenʹ u redaktsiyi nakazu Ministerstva yustytsiyi Ukrayiny 26.12.2012 № 1950/5. [Scientific and methodological recommendations on the preparation and appointment of forensic examinations and expert studies]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98#Text [in Ukrainian
Kovalenko, I. (2020). Okremi vydy ekspertyz yak obovyazkovi slidchi (rozshukovi) diyi pid chas rozsliduvannya shakhraystva u sferi bankivsʹkykh elektronnykh platezhiv [Certain types of examinations as mandatory investigative (research) actions during the investigation of fraud in the field of bank electronic payments]. Pidpryyemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo – Entrepreneurship, economy and law, 12, 262-266 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2020.12.45
Dovhan, O. & Tarasyuk, A. (2018). Hlobalna kultura kiberbezpeky v systemi zapobihannya kiberzlochynnosti v Ukrayini [Global culture of cyber security in the system of cybercrime prevention in Ukraine]. Informatsiya i pravo – Information and Law, 3 (26), 94-103 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.37750/2616-6798.2018.3(26).270641
Voytovych, O. P., Vityuk, V. O. & Kaplun, V. A. (2013). Osoblyvosti doslidzhennya oznak shkidlyvoho prohramnoho zabezpechennya bez nayavnosti vykhidnykh kodiv [Peculiarities of studying the signs of malicious software without the presence of source codes]. Informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi ta kompyuterna inzheneriya – Information technologies and computer engineering, 3, 4-9 [in Ukrainian].
