CRITERIA FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF REASONABLENESS IN CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS UNDER MARTIAL LAW IN UKRAINE

Автор(и)

Ключові слова:

contractual obligations, principles of civil legislation, , foundations of civil legislation, reasonableness, good faith, fairness, martial law, harmonization, international codifications of private law principles, EU legislation, contract

Анотація

The scientific article is devoted to the study of the criteria for applying the principle of reasonableness in contractual obligations under martial law in Ukraine. It is substantiated that the traditional criteria for applying the principle of reasonableness in contractual obligations, developed by doctrine and case law for ordinary circumstances, require reconsideration and adaptation to the realities of wartime. In view of the above, the outlined topic is relevant and requires thorough theoretical elaboration.

The purpose of the article is to explore the criteria for applying the principle of reasonableness in contractual obligations under martial law in Ukraine based on the analysis of doctrinal sources, legal acts, and judicial practice.

The methodological basis of this scientific article consists of general scientific and special legal methods of cognition. In particular, the method of legal analysis made it possible to reveal the content of the criteria for applying the principle of reasonableness in contractual obligations, to study the genesis of this principle, to identify its connections with other principles of civil legislation, and to determine the possibility of its application to specific legal situations. The modeling method was applied as a universal tool for scientific argumentation of a number of conclusions regarding changes in the criteria for applying the principle of reasonableness under martial law in Ukraine. The concept of the principle of reasonableness was clarified through the use of methods of analysis and synthesis. The dialectical method made it possible to highlight the dynamics of the development of the principle of reasonableness under the new conditions of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation. The systemic method was used to determine the place of the principle of reasonableness within the system of civil law principles of Ukraine. The method of legal forecasting allowed to identify possible directions for harmonizing the civil legislation of Ukraine, which enshrines the principle of reasonableness in contractual obligations, with the principles of European contract law. The comparative legal method was applied when comparing the provisions of the Civil Code of Ukraine with one another, as well as with the provisions of international codifications of the principles of private law and national legislation.

The authors analyzed the provisions of the Civil Code of Ukraine that enshrine the principle of reasonableness and concluded that it is most vividly manifested in the sphere of contractual obligations. Particular attention was paid to doctrinal approaches to defining the principle of reasonableness and its interpretation in international codifications of the principles of private law. The practical significance of this principle for the effective functioning of the system of contractual obligations is substantiated.

Based on the conducted research, the main criteria used to assess the compliance of the actions of contractual parties with the principle of reasonableness were identified, namely: objectivity, consideration of specific circumstances, predictability of consequences, and balance of interests. It is concluded that under martial law in Ukraine, all these criteria of applying the principle of reasonableness in contractual obligations undergo changes: in terms of objectivity, the very standard of a «reasonable person» is transformed; when considering specific circumstances, risks caused by wartime must be taken into account; the temporal dimension of applying the criterion of predictability of consequences is altered; in balancing the interests of contractual parties and public interests, the latter gains greater weight. This indicates the development of the principle of reasonableness in contractual obligations under new legal realities, which, in the context of the renewal of civil legislation in Ukraine, may serve as a foundation for further scientific research.

Завантажити

Дані для завантаження поки недоступні.

Біографії авторів

  • Іryna Lukasevych-Krutnyk, West Ukrainian National University

    Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure

  • Roman Krutnyk

    Lawyer, Head of the Law Firm «Krutnyk and Partners»

Посилання

1. Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Civil Code of Ukraine] (2003, January 16). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text [in Ukrainian]

2. Pro vvedennia voiennoho stanu v Ukraini: Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 24 liutoho 2022 roku № 64/2022 [On the introduction of martial law in Ukraine: Decree of the President of Ukraine dated February 24, 2022 № 64/2022] (2022, February 24). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/64/2022#Text [in Ukrainian]

3. Uvarova, O. O. (2009). Rol pryntsypiv prava u protsesi pravozastosuvannia [The role of principles of law in the process of law enforcement. Candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian]

4. Rusu, S. D. & Stefanchuk, M. O. (2003). Problemy vyznachennia poniattiadobrosovisnosti ta rozumnosti u tsyvilnomu pravi [Problems of defining the concepts of good faith and reasonableness in civil law]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho instytutu rehionalnoho upravlinnia ta prava - Bulletin of the Khmelnytsky Institute of Regional Management and Law, 2 (6), 53-57 [in Ukrainian]

5. Krutnyk, R. (2024). The principle of good faith in contractual obligations in the context of the modernization of civil legislation of Ukraine. Aktualni problemy pravoznavstva - Current problems of law, 2 (38), 78-84 [in English]

6. Zhornokui, V. H. (2022). Porushennia kryteriiv dobrosovisnosti ta rozumnosti yak pidstava vidpovidalnosti chleniv orhaniv pidpryiemnytskykh tovarystv [Violation of the criteria of good faith and reasonableness as a basis for liability of members of the bodies of business associations]. Retrieved from https://dspace.univd.edu.ua/entities/publication/6825cc8b-a8cb-49f0-9978-fbfdbecd8bbf [in Ukrainian]

7. Borysova, V. I. (Ed.), Spasybo-Fatieieva, I. V., Yarotsky, V. L. et al. (2011). Tsyvilne pravo: pidruchnyk: U 2‑kh t. T. 1 [Civil law: textbook: In 2 volumes. Vol. 1]. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian]

8. Dzera, O. V. (Ed.), Kuznietsova, N. S., Luts, V. V. (2006). Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar Tsyvilnoho kodeksu Ukrainy: U 2 t. 2-e vyd., pererobl. i dop. T. 1. [Scientific and practical commentary on the Civil Code of Ukraine: In 2 vols. 2nd ed., revised and supplemented. Vol. 1.]. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].

9. Tobota, Yu. A. (2020). Pryntsyp spravedlyvosti, dobrosovisnosti i rozumnosti u tsyvilnomu pravi: monohrafiia [The principle of justice, good faith and reasonableness in civil law: monograph]. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian]

10. Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law. Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). Munich: Interim Outline Edition, 2008. Retrieved from https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/EUROPEAN_PRIVATE_LAW/EN_EPL_20100107_Principles__definitions_and_model_rules_of_European_private_law_-_Draft_Common_Frame_of_Reference__DCFR_.pdf [in English]

11. Pryntsypy mizhnarodnykh komertsiinykh dohovoriv UNIDRUA 2010 [Principles of International Commercial Contracts UNIDROIT 2010]. Retrieved from https://www.unidroit.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Unidroit-Principles-2010-Ukranian-bl.pdf [in Ukrainian]

12. Luts, V. V. (1992). Stroky v tsyvilnykh pravovidnosynakh: konspekt lektsii z spetskursu [Time limits in civil legal relations: a summary of lectures from a special course]. Lviv: LDU [in Ukrainian]

13. Holubieva, N. Yu. (2013). Zoboviazannia u tsyvilnomu pravi: metodolohichni zasady pravovoho rehuliuvannia: monohrafiia [Obligations in civil law: methodological principles of legal regulation: monograph]. Odesa: Feniks [in Ukrainian]

14. Postanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 02 lystopada 2021 roku u spravi № 917/1338/18 [Resolution of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court of November 2, 2021 in case № 917/1338/18]. Retrieved from https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/media/new_folder_for_uploads/supreme/2021_12_29_prezent_Krat.pdf [in Ukrainian]

15. Postanova Verkhovnoho Sudu u skladi kolehii suddiv Tretoi sudovoi palaty Kasatsiinoho tsyvilnoho sudu vid 12 liutoho 2025 r. u spravi № 679/1103/23 [Resolution of the Supreme Court composed of the panel of judges of the Third Judicial Chamber of the Civil Court of Cassation dated February 12, 2025 in case № 679/1103/23]. Retrieved from https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/125540068 [in Ukrainian]

16. Pro zabezpechennia zakhystu natsionalnykh interesiv za maibutnimy pozovamy derzhavy Ukraina u zviazku z viiskovoiu ahresiieiu Rosiiskoi Federatsii: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv vid 2 bereznia 2022 roku № 187. [On ensuring the protection of national interests in future lawsuits of the state of Ukraine in connection with the military aggression of the Russian Federation: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers dated March 2, 2022 № 187] (2022, March 2). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/187-2022-%D0%BF#Text [in Ukrainian].

Завантаження

Опубліковано

31.10.2025

Номер

Розділ

ЦИВІЛЬНЕ ПРАВО І ЦИВІЛЬНИЙ ПРОЦЕС. СІМЕЙНЕ ПРАВО. МІЖНАРОДНЕ ПРИВАТНЕ ПРАВО. ГОСПОДАРСЬКЕ ПРАВО. ГОСПОДАРСЬКО-ПРОЦЕСУ

Як цитувати

Lukasevych-Krutnyk Іryna, and Roman Krutnyk. “CRITERIA FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF REASONABLENESS IN CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS UNDER MARTIAL LAW IN UKRAINE”. Актуальні проблеми правознавства, no. 3, Oct. 2025, pp. 110-6, https://appj.wunu.edu.ua/index.php/appj/article/view/2182.