Features of Legal Status of the Head of the Prosecutor's Office under the Norms of the Updated Legislation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35774/app2020.01.185Keywords:
head, prosecutor's offices, legal status, powers, reformAbstract
The reform of the system of prosecuting authorities, that is currently under the influence of European integration processes, influences the legal status of heads, giving them more or less authority. The effectiveness of head's administrative activity in the performance of his powers depends not only on his organizational and professional abilities, but on a greater extent on what powers he is empowered also. The author analyzed the heads’ status of at all levels, systematized and classified their powers also.
The author points out that the proper legislative provision of legal status, together with an optimized administrative style, modern information and analytical support and social and material support, can lay the foundations on which the head’s activity can truly be recognized as effective in all respects.
In the article the author improved the definition of the head of the prosecutor's office, under which it is proposed to consider a prosecutor who is appointed to an administrative position in accordance with the procedure established by law and in accordance with official powers and duties, performs managerial functions, continuing to perform the functions of prosecutor, non-prosecutor for failure to perform or improperly perform administrative functions. The author improves the definition of the form of activity of the head of the prosecutor's office, under which it is proposed to consider normatively regulated permissible external manifestations of his activity within the limits given to him by the law in the process of exercising specific administrative functions.
Having analyzed the rules of the law on the prosecutor's office, the author proposes to classify the powers of the complex administrative and legal status of the head of the prosecutor's office according to the peculiarities of the activities performed, into: representative; organizational; administrative; disciplinary; affirmative; qualifying; analytical and rulemaking. According to individual classification characteristics, such a detailed division of powers makes it possible to more clearly set the limits of the competencies of heads of prosecutors' bodies, identify common and different competencies.
Among the fundamental principles of the functioning of the prosecuting authorities that influence the formation of the legal status of the head, it is proposed to distinguish subordination, centralization and combination of unity and collegiality.
In the study of the activities of the head of the prosecutor's office, it is pointed out that it is advisable to apply a narrowed approach to the interpretation of the division of his activities into internal organizational and external administrative. In particular, from the proposed classification of powers according to the peculiarities of the activity performed, the author proposes to consider representative powers as externally administrative, and organizational, administrative, disciplinary, affirmative, qualifying, analytical and rulemaking as internally administrative.
References
Zakon Ukrainy «Pro prokuraturu» vid 14 zhovtnia 2014 roku № 1697-VII (2015). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady - Bulletin of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 2-3, 12 [in Ukrainian].
Bandurka, O. O. (2005). Upravlinnia Derzhavnoiu podat, st.kovoiu sluzhboiu v Ukraini [Management of the State Tax Service in Ukraine]: monohrafiia. Kharkiv: NUVS [in Ukrainian].
Derzhavne upravlinnia: problemy administratyvno-pravovoi teorii ta praktyky [Public administration: problems of administrative law theory and practice] (2003) / za zah. red. V. B. Averianova. Kyiv: Fakt, 2003 [in Ukrainian].
Kurys, A. S. (2011). Normatyvno-pravovi zasady administratyvnoi diialnosti kerivnyka v orhanakh prokuratury Ukrainy [Normative-legal principles of administrative activity of the head in the bodies of the prosecutor's office of Ukraine]. Forum prava - Forum of law, 2, 483–490. URL: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/FP/2011-2/11kacopu.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Ozerskyi, I. V. (2010). Sutnist upravlinskoi diialnosti v orhanakh prokuratury [The essence of administrative activity in the bodies of the prosecutor's office]. Pravo i suspilstvo - Law and Society, 2, 68–72 [in Ukrainian].
Tohobitska-Hromova, A. A. (2019). Kerivnyk v orhanakh prokuratury: administratyvno-pravovyi status [Head of the Prosecutor's Office: administrative and legal status:]: avtoref. dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.07. Sumy [in Ukrainian].
Brus, I.I. (2015). Poriadok pryznachennia prokurora na administratyvnu posadu [Procedure for appointing a prosecutor to an administrative position]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal - Legal scientific electronic journal, 1, 208-211 [in Ukrainian].
Zubko, A. O. (2018). Administratyvno-pravovyi status Departamentu mizhnarodnykh sporiv Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy [Administrative and legal status of the Department of International Disputes of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine]: dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.07. Naukovo-doslidnyi instytut publichnoho prava. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Vyshnevskyi, M. V. (2018). Administratyvno-pravovyi status subiektiv publichnoi administratsii, shcho zdiisniuiut administratyvno-pravove rehuliuvannia diialnosti aparatu sudu v Ukraini [Administrative and legal status of public administration entities that carry out administrative and legal regulation of the activity of the court apparatus in Ukraine]. Naukovyi visnyk publichnoho ta pryvatnoho prava - Bulletin of Public and Private Law, 6(1), 213-216 [in Ukrainian].
Klochkov, V. (2019). Problemy zakonodavchoho zabezpechennia diialnosti systemy prokuratury ta dosudovoho slidstva [Problems of Legislative Support of the Public Prosecutor's Office and Pre-trial Investigation System]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo - Entrepreneurship, economy and law, 2, 254-259 [in Ukrainian].
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy, pryiniata Verkhovnoiu Radoiu Ukrainy 28 chervnia 1996 r. [Constitution of Ukraine, adopted by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on June 28, 1996]. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy - Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Review, 30, 141 [in Ukrainian].
Tohobitska-Hromova, A. (2019). Vymohy do kerivnyka yak orhanizatora upravlinnia v orhanakh prokuratury v umovakh reformuvannia [Requirements for the Head as Organizer of Management in the Prosecutor's Offices in the Conditions of Reform]. Natsionalnyi yurydychnyi zhurnal: teoriia praktyka - National Law Journal: Theory of Practice, 117-121. [in Ukrainian].
Rybalka, N. O. (2013). Upravlinnia orhanamy prokuratury Ukrainy v umovakh reformuvannia: administratyvno-pravovi zasady [Management of the Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine in the context of reform]: dys. ... dokt. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.07, Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Akademii prokuratury Ukrainy [Proceedings of the Academy of the Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine] (2009). Retrieved from http://www.info-library.com.ua/books-book-185.html [in Ukrainian].
Brus, I. I. (2015). Poriadok pryznachennia prokurora na administratyvnu posadu [Procedure for appointing a prosecutor to an administrative position]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal - Legal scientific electronic journal, 1, 208-211 [in Ukrainian].
Kodeks profesiinoi etyky ta povedinky prokuroriv, zatverdzhenyi 27.04.2017 roku [Code of Professional Ethics and Conduct of Prosecutors, approved on 27.04.2017]. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/n0001900-17 [in Ukrainian].
Kurys, A. S. (2011). Administratyvno-pravovyi status kerivnyka v orhanakh prokuratury [Administrative and legal status of the head of the prosecutor's office]: dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.07. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Martyniuk, O. H. (2018). Administratyvna diialnist orhaniv prokuratury [Administrative activities of the prosecution bodies]: dys. k.iu.n.: 12.00.07. Ternopil [in Ukrainian].
Puzyrnyi, V. F. (2014). Administratyvna diialnist deiakykh pravookhoronnykh orhaniv (na prykladi orhaniv prokuratury) [Administrative activity of some law enforcement agencies (on the example of prosecuting authorities)]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Ser.: Yurysprudentsiia. - Bulletin of the International Humanities University. Jurisprudence, 12 (1), 101-104 [in Ukrainian].
Bilodid, I. M. (2015). Administratyvni povnovazhennia orhaniv prokuratury Ukrainy [Administrative powers of the Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu - Scientific Bulletin of Uzhgorod National University, 63-67. [in Ukrainian].
Shuba, V. V. (2007). Administratyvno-pravovi vidnosyny v diialnosti orhaniv prokuratury: zahalnoteoretychni aspekty [Administrative-legal relations in activity of bodies of prosecutor's office: general theoretical aspects: author's abstract.]: avtoref. dys. ... kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.07. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Zakon Ukrainy «Pro zapobihannia koruptsii» vid 14 zhovtnia 2014 roku № 1700-VII [The Law of Ukraine “On Prevention of Corruption” of October 14, 2014 No. 1700-VII4] (2015). Відомості Верховної Ради (ВВР) - Bulletin of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 49, 2056 [in Ukrainian].